Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

512 JONES AND EYLES November the rail, thus mechanically amplified, were plotted against time as recorded by the camera time base. This method has now been used successfully for a large number of applications to industrial problems. A more elaborate optical-mechanical arrangement has been described by Eyles9 and was used in the course of the examination of the movement of the anvil of a large drop-forging hammer. The hammer itself weighed 8 tons and, after operation for some time, it was found 005 005 O 5 10 X-OOI SEC. Fig. 6 — Optical-mechanical arrangement for examination of movement of anvil in large drop-forging hammer. a. Convex lens attached to a reflecting prism fastened to anvil to give a uniformly bright disk of light that can be photographed. b. Method of damping shutter blade with a dashpot so that top edge of blade is just below bottom edge of mask on illuminated disk. c. Enlarged section of b. d. Curve showing amplitude and duration of the vibration of the anvil. that the foundations of the anvil showed signs of deterioration. The noise, flame, and smoke produced when the hammer was dropped were such that visual observation of the movement of the anvil was difficult, and various observers estimated it at between one hundredth of an inch and a quarter of an inch at each blow. Direct photography of the anvil was out of the question, owing to the small degree of movement and the shock transmitted through the surrounding ground. It was therefore decided to photograph a point on the anvil in relation