Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

548 HIGGONS instrument away from the intense illumination area. The cell connects to an electrical instrument providing a basic range of 3000 foot-candles which will be found adequate for most outdoor work, except under rare conditions of very bright sunlight. Two carefully calibrated slipon diffusion multipliers with 1/2-mch aluminum aperture plates are supplied to extend the range to 30,000 and 300,000 foot-candles, respectively. An exposure table will be supplied with each instrument giving appropriate camera settings for the various types of cameras and films in common use today. Thus, a completely reliable exposure determinant is provided for use with presently available illumination sources and with sufficient flexibility which probably will be capable of handling other ranges which may now be under development. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The writer wishes to acknowledge the very excellent assistance and co-operation of J. H. Waddell, A. T. Williams, and L. D. Smith, who played an important part in the development of this design. DISCUSSION MB. A. J. SHAFER: What sort of allowances apply for reciprocity failure. MR. E. T. HIGGONS: I believe the reciprocity failure does not enter into it too seriously. MR. J. H. WADDELL: We might comment that the exposure tables that will be furnished with the meter are going to be established from actually running the picture tests. We know values now, and on the lower speed ranges, where one might be taking from 100 to 500 pictures a second, picture tests are under way for that particular range. We know, for example, that 150 to 170 thousand footcandles will allow pictures to be taken at 5000 a second at//ll. CHAIRMAN BRIAN O'BRIEN: Perhaps I may add one point on reciprocity failure at very low exposures. Many of you will recall that the Gurney solid-state theory of the photographic reaction predicts that after a certain minimum exposure time is reached, further shortening the exposure and increasing the intensity of the light correspondingly so that the product of time and intensity remains constant, will go from that point up to higher and higher intensities, and there is no new curve of reciprocity failure. The curve of reciprocity failure levels off. At exposure time less than 1 microsecond, a new reciprocity failure seems to come in for all thus far tested of the fast photographic emulsions. Therefore, in the event that any of you have occasion to work below \ microsecond, and particularly below Vio microsecond, this reciprocity failure, apparently not predicted by the Gurney and Mott theory, occurs. This is under investigation hi our laboratory at the moment, and I expect within a few months some numerical data will be forthcoming.