Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1949 CATHODE-RAY OSCILLOGRAPHY 563 Whenever recordings are made which include low plus high writing rates such as flat-topped, relatively long pulses with relatively fast rise times, the slower portions of the pattern become considerably overexposed causing halo around the cathode-ray-tube trace. This halo is a well-known phenomenon caused by the total reflection of the light from the cathode-ray-tube spot at angles beyond the critical angle for the glass-air interface.4 This halo can be eliminated completely by effectively making the glass face as thick, approximately, as the nominal radius of the tube face. This is a somewhat impractical solution, (b) (c) Fig. 15 — Effect of screen-coating procedure on halo: (a) flowed screen; (b) settled screen; (c) with plastic face plate. but the same effect may be obtained by placing in optical contact with the screen a cup-shaped lens of plastic, the contact being maintained by means of a liquid of suitable refractive index. Some work has been done on the cementing of plastic to the glass face in order to eliminate halo. The magnitude of the effect depends to a great extent on the proportion of the light which reaches angles near the critical at the glass-air interface. This effect may be minimized by a choice of screen-coating procedure which directs a large proportion of the light foreward rather than at angles close to the critical. Fig. 15 shows