Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

674 LEVENSON December electrode and a high-salt buffer as described in a previous paper.7* Analyses of the air in the spray cabinet were made by drawing off a 50-milliliter sample of air and absorbing the oxygen in alkaline pyrogallol in a Hempel pipet. The air was sampled through a cock fitted in the back panel of the spray cabinet about 9 inches from the bottom. Ordinary photographic grade ' 'Kodak-Tested" chemicals were used, and tap water was employed in all the runs involving a large volume of solution. TIME (HOURS) Fig. 6 — Change of composition of the positive developer at pH 10.5 in two runs in the S-R Spray system. At the outset the survey was based on D76d, as a typical negative developer, and the following positive developer : Elon 1 . 72 grams Hydroquinone 3 . 30 grams Sodium sulfite 37. 8 grams Sodium carbonate 21.2 grams Water to 1 liter In a number of makings the pR of the D76d varied between 8.6 and 8.8. The pH. of the positive developer was adjusted with sodium hydroxide to 10.5 =*= 0.05. This somewhat high level was deliberately chosen so as to extend the pK range covered. Later, in the * NOTE: The pH values obtained in this way, in the IN NaCl buffer using an AgCl/0.1 N KC1 reference electrode, read 0.3 unit higher than the values that would be obtained using a saturated calomel electrode in any buffer,