Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

678 LEVENSON December Running Cost In order to illustrate the relative cost in developing agents of running the various systems, without processing film, the values from Table II are shown pictorially in Fig. 8, 1 .0 gram of Elon being taken as equal in cost to 2.0 grams of hydroquinone* At pH. 8.7, in the case of D76d, the loss of developing agent is negligible in the quiet circulation system. The cost of running the S-R Spray system is about one third of that for the air-trapping and about one fourth of that for the air-bubbling system. The cost of running the L-R Spray system is far greater than any of the others. -H SPRAY QUIET AIR-TRAPPING COSTS IN GRAMS HYDROOUINONE PCH HOUR Fig. 8 — Diagrammatic representation of the data given in Table II. The values refer only to the cost of chemicals wasted by aerial oxidation. At pH 10.5 both the spray systems are more costly to run than the other systems. The quiet-circulation system loses an insignificant quantity of developing agent. The air-trapping and air-bubbling systems cost about two thirds as much as the S-R Spray system, and about one sixth as much as the L-R Spray system. At pH 10.0 the cost of running the two spray systems is roughly two thirds of the cost at pH. 10.5. The presence of colloidal silver made no significant difference to the cost of running, and in the diagram the best value for a particular system is probably the mean between the figures shown for the rates with and without the colloidal silver. The minimum cost of running a bath depends upon the amount of silver that is to be reduced to form the image. Evans8 quotes figures for the silver content of 1000 feet of motion picture positive image; * Based on prices in Great Britain.