Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

692 LEE December REVIEW A brief review of the salient features of the cell is probably in order. The photoelectric action is internal (as opposed to the external photoeffect or photoemission). An excess of free electrons in the thin layer of active material results in an increased electrical conductivity. Cells of this type may be used as receptors in circuits much the same as those used with photoemissive tubes; the signal voltage is developed across a resistance in series with the cell, and polarizing voltages of 45 to -90 volts are commonly used. The voltage sensitivity is high; in some cases, up to 30 decibels increase in output signal may be realized over a vacuum photoemissive tube. The frequency response seems to be adequate; Cashman mentions a loss of the order of 7 decibels at" 10 kilocycles per second. The spectral response is concentrated in the infrared1 with a peak at 2 to 2.5 microns, and cutoff at approximately 3.5 microns. The response, however, can be varied considerably,2 by varying the amount of oxide in the active material. The noise level is very low, and attainable signal-to-noise ratios are very high. Furthermore, the absolute noise output decreases when the cell is illuminated, in contrast to the behavior of photoemissive tubes, in which the noise voltage is proportional to the square root of the mean photocurrent. Finally, the effect is apparently quite linear with light intensity, at least within certain limits. This point will be discussed in more detail later. THEORY OF A SIGNAL CIRCUIT USING A PHOTOCONDUCTIVE CELL Additional understanding of the use of a photoconductive cell may be gained by a rather elementary mathematical approach. Consider a light-sensitive area like that shown cross-hatched in Fig. 1. The following symbols will be used in the treatment: L = distance between electrodes X = width of electrodes T = thickness of photoconductive coating po = specific resistance of the coating gr0 = l/po = specific conductance of the coating : G = conductance of the tube R = I/Or = resistance of the tube / = light intensity (flux per unit area on sensitive surface) . •** ; =?.. angular frequency of alternating-current light excitation RO = load resistance in signal circuit, Fig. 2 E = supply voltage to signal circuit EQ = signal voltage eo «= alternating-current component of signal voltage