Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

NEXT CONTINUOUS AIR FROM FRONT JE1 DEPTH OF FOCUS RANGE OF LENS I 1 f I f 1 I CONTINUOUS AIR FROM REAR JET Fig. 3. Film displacement due to buckling at center of frame — Continuous Air. (a) The air from the front jet was modulated by means of a rotary valve driven from the shutter shaft. (b) The air from the rear jet was not modulated and the steady stream of air from this jet was used to force the film toward the lens, thus partly neutralizing the internal forces, which tend to make the film take a deep negative buckle under the influence of light. (c) The correcting air pulses from the joint jet were timed so that the resultant forces from both front and rear jets opposed the cyclicly varying buckle forces. The motion of each film frame on the optical axis could thus be controlled. Figure 5 illustrates the timing of the jets and shows that the position of the film frame can be held steady within fairly close limits. It should be noted that the excursions of the film frame surface can be confined to the depth-offocus range of the lens. Good optical performance is thus attained over virtually the entire frame cycle. Figure 5 also shows that a negative displacement of approximately 0.012 in. is allowed to exist at the center of the frame. The question may be asked, "Why is the process not carried beyond this point so as to bring the displacement to zero?" There are two reasons for not doing so. The first, as pointed out by Kolb, is concerned with the performance of the projection lens. In most projection lenses the focal plane of field is not truly a plane, but rather a curved surface. For best performance in this respect, the film is allowed to approximate this surface. The second reason is that flat film seems to be somewhat flaccid under the influence of air flow, as compared to film which is bowed to even a slight degree. Since the film can be kept within the depth-of-focus limit of the projection lens during nearly the entire time of the two 98 August 1952 Journal of the SMPTE Vol. 59