Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (1950-1954)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

4.5 4.0 3.5 5 3'° « 2.5 I ^ 2.0 1.5 1.0 0 5 ~ 3 ^ *^ ^ *^* * '=1.0 X ^ ^^ ^~~ ' ~~~ / ^ ^ •x A S 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12. Fig. 12. Plot of time factor (turbulent developing time compared to "no agitation*' developing time) as a function of Re°-*/D; • gamma = 1.3; X gamma = 1.0. -XlO" Fig. 13. Plot of time factor (turbulent developing time compared to "constant agitation" developing time) as a function of R<P-*/D; • gamma = 1.3; X gamma = 1.0. .3.0 2.5 2.0 1.0 7 = 1.3 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 of standard deposits which had been obtained from "no agitation" and "continuous agitation" washing tests. Results Turbulent Developing. The results of the turbulent developing experiments are shown in Figs. 10 to 15, inclusive. These figures contain only the digested data obtained from the readings of the various samples. Figures 10 and 11 contain all the data obtained in the "no agitation" developing tests and the "constant agitation" developing* tests run as control tests before and after the turbulent developing tests. In order to have a basis for comparison, average curves were drawn through all these points which produced the average "no agitation" curve and the average "constant agitation" curve. These average curves were used for comparison whenever the control test data in the experiments had been spoiled by fogging. In addition the average curves were used as a check to observe that the daily control tests did Katz and Esthimer: Turbulent Fluid Processing 121