Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (1950-1954)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

START j. 1. Micro-shadowgraph of head wear 250,000 FT. 120 MRS 580,000 FT -268 MRS. 750,000 FT -345 MRS. 1,000,000 FT. -475 HRS 1,420,000 FT -660 HRS. 1,680,000 FT. -777 HRS. -. u iJ E 005 Ns^rl J8 HOUR s — •*. -— -^ -^ — ^, 580 HOURS 1 ? .010 "^ ^. •^••^^ ±= 3 5 .015 Ll 020 L. J J L " ^> \ 7 777 HOURS' 7 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 1,600,000 < FEET OF' FILM i 1 ^ ** "*"" "* "*» O\ x \ / s^ — ORIGINAL THICKNESS OF POLE PIECE =.025 IN 7ed every four hours, and the contour of te head was checked on a Jones & imson comparator at 100:1 magnifi •ition, every eight hours (Fig. 1). tiese loops had 6000 cycles/sec pre Icorded on them to check the output jdtage of the head throughout the tests. In the 4-hr period, one loop passed 60 times through the projector and ere was no noticeable drop in the out Fig. 2. Effect of wear on pole-piece thickness. put voltage of the 6000-cycle signal. The heads tested were used to record and reproduce signals after the tests were terminated and they still functioned satisfactorily. Figure 2 shows the rapid wear of heads during the first 88 hr in test. This is due to the small pole-piece area of a new head supporting the film and to its surface condition. The remainder of del Valle and Ferber: Wear of Magnetic Heads 503