Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (1950-1954)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ECHO DELAY IN PICTURE ELEMENTS = O)ftT/ 7T I I °if Fig. 14. Relation between echo amplitude and echo delay for double-excursion K = 0.1 in characteristic. however, to leave the approximate equations (9) and (11) of the Appendix, upon which equations (2) are based, and use the exact equations (8) and (9). This is because in this region of echo delays a tends to become large. When the exact equations are used, the shape of the curve for a is affected, as well as its magnitude, by the constant values chosen for R and <£. These relationships have been plotted in Figs. 12, 13 and 14. The figures illustrate the echo amplitudes, for various echo delays, that are set by a fixed excursion in transmission characteristic within the nominal passband. In Fig. 12 this double excursion is set at K = R = 1 for the amplitude response, and at K = $ = 1 radian for the phase. In Fig. 13 it is set at K = 0.3, and in Fig. 14 at/T= 0.1. In the plots the relationship presented between echo amplitude and echo delay is not the compromise which was mentioned earlier in the discussion. A separate figure for a is in each case derived, respectively, from equations (8) and (10) of the Appendix. The use of the exact equations causes a further complication. In the approximate equations (2) the results are the same regardless of whether the assumed echo is positive or negative. When the exact equations are used this is no longer the case, and separate plots have been made for positive and negative echoes in Figs. 12, 13 and 14. The trend of the curves in Fig. 12 is rather complicated because of the large Pierre M ertz: Television Transmission Echoes 587