Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 61 Mr. INIcCann. Yon certainlj^ were not with Mr. Schenck in New York discnssing any arrangements at all, but Mr. Casey was there, according to this record. Mr. Mannix. I was not there. 'Mr. McCann. I am not interested, and I want to re-emphasize the fact, I am not concerned with respect to the economic battle between various elements here, but I am concerned over this whole historical picture which has been opened through the matters which have been read, the battle between the unions which has covered apparently a number of years, and particularly the position of the union leaders in not surrendering any of their jurisdiction. Now, yesterday you said that you thought it might be possible, if we could get these fellows together, to get some settlement of those issues. You have heard the statement read, what Mr. Walsh said about getting together with Mr. Hutcheson and it didn't seem to do any good; there was no yielding on the part of the carpenters. I wondered, was there any statement at any time made to you personally by Mr. Walsh with I'espect to this situation that would enlighten the committee. Mr. Mannix. Mr. Walsh told me in one of the conferences personally what led to him going to New York and having a lot of 8-by-lO pictures and sorting them, and I think he told me there was a thousand pictures in which they showed the work, and the first 2 days the same thing seemed to progress very well, and the third day it blew up. I didn't know who was present at that conference, but Walsh knows. So I spoke to him many times and asked whether he and Hutchesoji couldn't get together, and each time I bring it up he recites this particular situation. During that, Walsh told me that there was about a thousand pictures and that they had gone through practically all of them, and there was a pile on one side and a pile on the other, that he had given up his jurisdiction to Hutcheson, and Hutcheson came in the third morning and said, "Dick, it is all off. I must have all wood, wood substitutes, and wood working machinery." And that seems to be a pretty firm stand. Of course, that is what we are confronted with in these jurisdictional strikes. Mr. McCann. Mr. Chairman, I have no further questions at this time. I would like to excuse Mr. Mannix subject to the same condition^ and here is a question I have been requested to ask. Mr. Kearns. I have a few more questions to ask him. Do you have any correspondence with Mr. Walsh and Mr. Hutcheson that you could make available to this committee ? Mr. Mannix. Personally ? All communications between Walsh and Hutcheson would have been carried on by the association, the labor department of the association. Mr. Kearns. You personally would not have any ? Mr. Mannix. I would not have any communication with them whatsoever. ]Mr. Kearns. Do you agree with what Mr. Walsh said in the statement, that possibly this closed-shop situation was the beginning of all the trouble here in the Hollywood studios ? Mr. Mannix. Well, that is a difficult statement. If closed shop brought greater jurisdictional lines, I would agree with it.