Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 75 Mr. McCann. They are all in the one local? Mr. Caset. That is right. Mr. McCann. I have heard somewhere that a person who sewed on a button could not fasten the button. Mr. Casey. Oh, I don't believe that stuff. Mr. McCann. You don't think that is true? Mr. Casey. No ; I do not. Mr. McCann. Mr. Cecil DeMille told of a leading; lady who had her dress torn and the seamstress mended the dress but she could not fasten the dress, and that cost a lot of money. Could you explain that? Mr. Casey. I never heard of it. Mr. McCann. We will have to have Mr. DeMille tell us about that •dress. Mr. Casey. That is right. Mr. McCann. The lATSE has a local made up of all of these hairdressers ? Mr. Casey. Right. Mr. McCann. Face Mr. Casey. Body make-up, make-up, and hairdressers. Mr. McCann. Is that a new local, or how long has that existed? Mr. Casey. Oh, no; that has been in existence for a long, long while. Mr. McCann. It is an old local ? Mr. Caset. Yes, sir. Mr. McCann. Now, you have given us all those in the conference union. Have there been any other locals that have been chartered by the conference group ? Mr. Casey. I don't think so. ]Mr. McCann. Do those locals that are in the painters' group give you any trouble over their jurisdictional rights ? Mr. Casey. Well, they had the strike over jurisdictional rights between the interior decorators and some that local 40 of the lATSE claimed. Mr. ]\IcCann. Tell us about that. I want to get all the facts on these things. Mr. Casey. Well, we originally made a contract with the interior decorators, which was a society. Mr. McCann. It was not then Mr. Casey. Not affiliated with any union at all. That contract was for 5 years, and I think it was from 1939 or 1940 — anyway along in there somewhere — for a 5-year period. In 1942, at our negotiations in New York City, local 40 of the lATSE claimed jurisdiction over those people. Mr. McCann. You mean 44? Mr. Casey. No ; I mean '42. Mr. MoCann. I say, do you mean local 44 of the lATSE Mr. Casey. Yes. Mr. McCann. Claimed jurisdiction in 1942? Mr. Casey. That is correct. That is correct. Mr. McCann. Go ahead, now ; let's get the story. Mr. Casey. Now, the contract with the society at that time had a clause to the effect that if the society joined with any other organiza