Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

332 MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES to quarrel with any of you. I have no disposition to be nasty with anyone. I do resent anything reflecting on the Congress or myself. There have been about ";>00 people here who watched this hearing for about 2 or 3 weeks. We are not going around the corner saying anything in private and planning or plotting against anyone. We are dealing with everybody in the controversy. We are taking testimony from everyone that has anything to offer. We don't know of a person we have passed up. You can say to the letter carriers I hope that they will be at the door on Christmas morning. You can say to them I like the letter carriers. And furtliermore, the last people I represented in civil life was a group of postal employees, and I was very fond of all of them. That is all I have to say, Mr. Chairman. Mr. DoHERTY. In behalf of the letter carriers of the United States and my own behalf, I accept Mr. McCann's apology. Mr. Kearns. Thank you, Mr. Doherty. Mr. Knight has a statement to make. Mr. Knight. Not unless we are through. If we are going on the witness stand tomorrow ; no, sir. Mr. Kearxs. You are excused. You are excused, but not dismissed. Mr. McCann.' Mr. Murphy. Mr. Kearns. Do you solemnly swear the testimony which you are •about to give to be tlie truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God ? Mr. Murphy. I do. TESTIMONY OF GEORGE L. MURPHY, ACTOR, LOS ANGELES, CALIF. Mr. McCann. Please state your name and your address. Mr. Murphy. George L. Murphy, 911 North Bedford, Beverly Hills, Calif. Mr. McCann. What is your occupation, sir? Mr. Murphy. I am an actor. Mr. McCann. How long have you been in that business? Mr. Murphy. About 23 years. Mr. McCann. How long have you been a member of the Guild of Actors ? Mr. Murphy. Since directly after its formation, which was about 10 or 11 years ago. Mr. McCann. Have you been active in its affairs? Mr. Murphy. Yes, sir. Mr. McCann. Will you, in your own words, give us a narrative of what took place between the actors who went to Chicago and the committee that have testified this afternoon? We are leaving out all the preliminaries before that, over which there is no dispute, what took place in Hollywood before you went, and what took place after you got back. We just want a comi^leto nai'rative from 3a)u of the peo])leyou talked with and what was said in Chicago. ]\Ir. MuRi'iiY. May I ask a question? You said with regard tothe commitee liere. We talked to people in Chicago, other than the men on the committee, the three-man board.