Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 369 where I am now sitting. I hope you will uphold the dignity of Congress and see that that is fulfilled before you adjourn. Mr. Kearns. I am making every effort possible to have that done. Mr, Skelton. Thank you. Mr, McCann, Mr, Tinsdale. I believe he was the other man who was referred to. Is he present ? (No response.) Air. Kearns. Is that Mr. Tinsdale — is that the right name, Mr. Sorrell? Mr. SoRRELL. That is the right name. I don't know whether he has been subpenaed. I have never seen him up here. Mr. Kearns. AVe have never subpenaed him. That will conclude that phase of it. Mr. McCann. Mr. Chairman, we will call back the vice presidents to the witness stand. Mr, Kearns. Mr. Doherty, Mr. Knight, please. TESTIMONY OF FELIX H. KNIGHT AND WILLIAM C. DOHERTY— Recalled Mr. McCann. I have a number of questions which have been submitted to be asked of you gentlemen. Yesterday we asked the question, Mr. Knight, with respect to the grip and carpenter contract. As I recall the answer at that time, it was stated that the grip and carpenter contract was taken into consideration and was submitted by the carpenters to your committee. Do you recall that testimony ? Mr. Knight. Well, I don't specifically recall that thing. But I imagine that the carpenters did submit it. They submitted quite a volume of stuff to us. Whether that particular item was contained in it I am not in a position to say at this time, until I check the records. Mr. McCann. May I ask, did you read the contract which was submitted by the carpenters, called the grip and carpenter contract ? Mr, Knight, I think we did. Mr. McCann. Are you sure that you have read that contract ? Mr. Knight. I wouldn't be too definite, because, of all the stuff that was submitted to us in a limited time, it was impossible, after taking all of this testimony from each of the organizations involved, to read everything that was presented. It is like all other committees, I have been on many arbitrations, and that is the history of them, in my experience on arbitrations for the past 35 years. Mr. McCann. So you are not sure and you wouldn't say emphatically you did read that contract? Mr. Knight. No; it is my impression I did, I wouldn't say definitely ; no, Mr. McCann, I would like to ask, Mr. Doherty, if you read the contract ? Mr. Doherty. In all likelihood I did. I don't recall at the instant. Mr. McCann. Yesterday you stated your understanding of a grip was just a laborer who carried material back and forth from the mill to the stage and vice versa, Mr. Doherty. I would like to direct your attention to that contract, and ask you if that contract does not provide that the grips shall do set erection, 67383— 48— vol. 1 25