Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

530 MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES The lu'xt three sections describe in detail our reasons for adopting the foregoing findings because of the rejection of some and tlie acceptance of otlier views of each of tlie disputants. (The study referred to will be found in the files of the committee.) Mr. McCann. Mr. Chairman, the order of business, as I understand it for tliis week, is that Mr. Cobb is to put on his testimony, to be followed by Mr. Sorrell's statement, and that Mr. Walsh and his witnesses will follow. Mr. Luddy will then present his side. I am hopino; we will have one day in which we may be able to call disinterested public witnesses who can throw light on this situation. I understand the chairman wants to finish here Friday night, and that he will hold sessions Wednesday night and Thursday night if necessary to do so. Mr. Kearns. That is right. I want you, too, Mr. Counsel, to consult with the other counsel so we do not have too much repetition of testimony. Mr. McCann. I trust that may be done, sir. Mr. Cobb, what is your first witness' name? Mr. Cobb. Mr. Cambiano. Mr. Kearns. Do you solemnly swear the testimony which you are about to give to be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God ? Mr. Cambiano. Yes. Mr. Kearns. Take the chair. TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH CAMBIANO, GENERAL REPRESENTATIVE OF WILLIAM L. HUTCHESON, GENERAL PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA Mr. McCann. Please state your name and address, Mr. Cambiano. Joseph Cambiano, 17 Aragon Boulevard, San Mateo, Calif. That is my northern address, and m^^ home. Here in southern California it is Stillwell Hotel, 838 South Grand. Mr. McCann. Where can you be reached by phone at any time? Mr. Cambiano. Here in southern California t can be reached at the Stillwell Hotel, Trinity 1151, or my residence in San Mateo, 4—3089. Mr. McCann. Will you please state what, if any, position you occupy in the union ? Mr. Cambiano. I am general representative of William L. Hutcheson, general president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. Mr. McCann. How long have you held that position ? Mr. Cambiano. Since the 3d day of May 1907; 11 years past. I might also state that I am president of the California State Council for the past over 20 years here in the State of California. Mr. McCann. You said 1907. You must have meant Mr. Cambiano. 1937. Mr. McCann. Have you been personally interested in the past 2 years in the Hollywood jurisdictional strike, sir? Mr. Cambiano. I was given the assignment to soutUern California— not only in the studios but over the entire workings of the Brotherhood of Carpenters, which comprises the building, construction, milling and takes in the boat yards, cabinet shops, and all other