Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 1271 Mr. Owens. Did you make a request upon the carpenters at that time to give you any men ? Mr. BoKEX. We made repeated requests upon the carpenters, the painters, and the other strikinp; unions to return to work, to give us the men before we sought replacements. ]\[r. Owens. Your arrangement now with the stage hands is that under an open-shop contract, or are you proceeding under the act? Mr. BoREN. We are proceeding under the Taft-Hartley Act, as it applies to work in the carpenters', painters', and machinists' juris- dictions. ]N[r. OwExs. Have they asked for a union shop ? Mv. BoREN. Has the IA asked for a union shop ? Mr. OwExs. Yes. Mr. BoREN. The lA asked us, yes, to recognize the carpenters and painters, and we refused. IVIr. OwEXS. You say the lA asked you ? Mr. BoREN. Yes. ]\Ir. Owens. To recognize the carpenters and painters? INIr. BoREX. The men they had sent in to rephice the carpenters and painters, yes, they asked us. ]Mr. Oavens. I don't think you understand what I mean. I am asking, the ones you have your contract with, the lA, the stage hands, are you working under a union-shop agreement? Mv. BoREN. "With the stage hands ? Mr. Owens. Yes. Mv. Boren. No ; we have a closed-shop agreement. Mr. OwExs.' Oh, you have a closed-shop agreement? Mr. BoREX\ Yes. ISIr. Owens. In other words, that was placed in the contract back in 1944? Mr. BoREX. No, before that; that goes back to 1936. Mv. OwEXs. But the last contract was in 1944 ? ^Ir. BoREN. That is right. JSIr. OwEXs. And you expect to operate under that until when? Mr. Boren. Until its anniversary date, August 1949. Mr. Owens. Under the closed shop ? Mr. BoREN. Under the closed shop. August 10, 1949. Mr. Owens. That is the interpretation on it so far? Mr. BoREN. That is the advice I got from labor counsel. Mr. Owens. Well, we won't go into that. That is all, Mr. Chairman. ISIr. McCaxx. May I ask one question there? I think we need to make it a little clearer, Mr. Chairman, with respect to the refusal to contract, with reference to the carpenters and painters that have come into the studios since the incident of September 23,1946. As I understood you, Mr. Boren, you refused to sign a contract with machinists, painters, and carpenters who had been brought in since September 23. 1946; is that correct? Mr. BoREX. That is true. Mv. McCaxn. So that all of those replacements are working on a day-to-day basis in your plants? Mr. BoREN. That is true. Mr. Kearns. But thev belong to the lA ? Mr. BoREN. I don't think so, not all of them by any means. We don't call upon the lA for carpenters, painters, and set designers.