Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1372 MOTION-PICTURE JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES During the strike our men continued to work in the studios and many of them are still working there today. When Mr. Wilson testified in Los Angeles before your committee, he read into the record the jurisdiction of the stationary branch of our union and sho^Yed you that there were many jobs in the studios which were clearly and rightfully within the jurisdiction of our craft. At that time we were interested only in having recognition of our jurisdiction insofar as heating plants, refrigeration plants, air- conditioning plants, and boiler plants are concerned. We wish an opportunity to bargain with the producers for wages and working conditions for our men. The strife in the studios has contributed in no small measure to the weak position in which we continue to find ourselves there. Mr. Keakns. Does that complete your statement, Mr. Hill? Mr. Hill. It does, sir. Mr. Kearns. Do 3'ou have any questions ? Mr. McCann. No questions. Mr. Kearns. Do you have any questions ? Mr. Owens. No questions, Mr. Kearns. Thank you very much for this contribution, Mr. Hill, • Mr. Hill. Thank you, and General President Maloney sends his regrets that he could not be here. Mr. Kearns. And please convey my best wishes to him. Ml-. Wilson. TESTIMONY OF LESTER 0. WILSON, LABOR-EELATIONS REPRE- SENTATIVE OF LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 12 AND 63, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS—Recalled Mr. Kearns. Will counsel identify the witness? Mr. McCann. Mr. Wilson, state your name, address, and telephone number. Mr. Wilson. Lester O. Wilson, Los Angeles, Calif.; 536 Maple Avenue. Phone number, Mutual 4356. Mr. McCann. Mr. Wilson, what position do 3"ou occupy with a trade union ? Mr. Wilson. Labor-relations representative for local unions Nos. 12 and 63, International Union of Operating Engineers. Mr. McCann. Mr. Wilson, you have previously testified l)efore our committee. I recall your testimony was very clear on the issues you raised. We asked you for some additional data. Did you bring that with you today ? ]Mr. Wilson. Yes, Mr. McCann. Before I present the evidence that was asked of me by this committee I want it clearly understood that the names on the affidavits—I have the original receipts, the books, and all the information requested—but should the informa- tion be made public knowledge the people involved here woukl no longer be employed in the studios. Mr. McCann. Mr. Chairman, I wonder if, under the circumstances, the books may not be shown to the chairman? I do not want to see them myself, nor the cards, but just so that the chairman may be able to identify these affidavits and then- let the affidavits be received