Der Kinematograph (April 1917)

Record Details:

Title:
Der Kinematograph
Date:
April 1917
Publisher:
Düsseldorf: E. Lintz
Volume:
Der Kinematograph (April 1917)
Leaf #:
000178
Language:
German
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Film Industry Trade Magazine","German Cinema
Collection:
Hollywood Studio System, Early Cinema, Global Cinema, and Germany
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library, Mikrofilmarchiv der deutschsprachigen Presse, in collaboration with Michael Cowan and the Department of Film Studies, University of St Andrews
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Germany’s first film trade journal, Der Kinematograph, played a prominent role in the film publishing landscape during the late Wilhelmine and Weimar periods and remains a key source for film historians today. The journal’s early history exemplifies the gradual emergence of cinema from the cinematograph, since it began as supplement to the popular variety journal Der Artist before becoming an independent publication dedicated to all aspects of the burgeoning film industry. As other scholars have pointed out, Der Kinematograph played an important role in the development of film criticism, especially after the ascension of Alfred Rosenthal to the position of chief editor in 1923. But it also covered a wide variety of topics from film history to technology to economic and juridical questions. The journal could also provide an interesting case study for the film politics of the Weimar period. In the early-1920s, it came under the control of the Scherl Verlag, run by the conservative media mogul Alfred Hugenberg (the Rupert Murdoch of his day), who would also acquire the UFA studio in 1927. This made it a prime target for left-wing groups such as the Volksverband für Filmkunst (Popular Association for Film Art), who saw Rosenthal and Hugenberg as key representatives of a capitalist mass media system dedicated to dumbing down the masses. In 1933, Der Kinematograph, like other film publications, was purged of Jewish colleagues, and the journal itself folded in 1935. —Michael Cowan, 2020
Date Added:
August 28, 2022
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Der Kinenmtograph — Düsseldorf No. 69» («eh noch sehr hässlichen und teilweise aiistüssigen Plakate mit den, Plakatverbot. Auch die IiwthU- i ilitsseu vornehmer »iifpiuiTti werden. m. B. Senaationsüberschriften wie Satan Opiluii. die fährlich wirken können, müssen auf jeden Fall vermieden werden. Die Mitglieder wollen für Abhilfe vrip'ii. Herr Graf, Vorsitzender des Zent ruh erbando der Kdmvei leilier, dankt für die Einladung zur heutigen Versammlung und ver¬ spricht, alle Wiinselie, durch deren Erfüllung der Stand iler I'lieater U-iatzer und Verleiher gehoben werden kann, zu lierücksM-htigen. Gleichzeitig erklärt Herr Graf, dass ab I. August 1917 au Hinge der Theater best tzer nicht inelir geliefert wert len kann. denn e~ -ei die Aufgabe iler Filmverleiher, für die l'nterbriiigung llir*T Kilua- l«estmöglichst selbst zu sorgen durel den direkten Verkehr mit den Theaterbesitzern. •sti-im te Entscheidung ih r d e Vor» . rlegung der Sju. zeit, die infolge der ab 1H. .1, M. • itr.-ieud.-n ..rz.-it um.- gängiirh »in-, sei n>« h nicht getroffen, d i nach A "-kunil .1*-- l’.-rrn Celiein.cn Obcrrcgieriiugsrntcs 1 ir. M>’-ter eine Abänderung d-i Bimdesratsverordnuiu: \-'in lä. Ikzcinbcr l'Uti in Erwägung t- gen sei. die ihre Krk-digung in riicr d<-r näehsten Itundor.it Viissehutls txiingen finden werden. Die Dcnutatiou halie die regierungsseitig vorgehnwhten < trund- ih • unseru Gesuch «-ntgi-gen-tehcu. als iu- iit stichhaltig gefunden und «k-r il -iftiung Ausdruck gegeben da— ihr»- Bitte, di auch in. al'gemcüi- n Volksint.Tesse lä-gen wind*-. üi Erfüllung gciieu ti ■ g. ln demselben Sinn.- sprach atu h Herr Ban dnsky-Dresden, il« r als Vertreter de- süclisisclien Verbunds« <len Verluindlung»-u l«ei Wanda Treumann