Der Kinematograph (August 1932)

Record Details:

Title:
Der Kinematograph
Date:
August 1932
Publisher:
Düsseldorf: E. Lintz
Volume:
Der Kinematograph (August 1932)
Leaf #:
00089
Language:
German
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Film Industry Trade Magazine","German Cinema
Collection:
Early Cinema, Global Cinema, Hollywood Studio System, and Germany
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library, Mikrofilmarchiv der deutschsprachigen Presse, in collaboration with Michael Cowan and the Department of Film Studies, University of St Andrews
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Germany’s first film trade journal, Der Kinematograph, played a prominent role in the film publishing landscape during the late Wilhelmine and Weimar periods and remains a key source for film historians today. The journal’s early history exemplifies the gradual emergence of cinema from the cinematograph, since it began as supplement to the popular variety journal Der Artist before becoming an independent publication dedicated to all aspects of the burgeoning film industry. As other scholars have pointed out, Der Kinematograph played an important role in the development of film criticism, especially after the ascension of Alfred Rosenthal to the position of chief editor in 1923. But it also covered a wide variety of topics from film history to technology to economic and juridical questions. The journal could also provide an interesting case study for the film politics of the Weimar period. In the early-1920s, it came under the control of the Scherl Verlag, run by the conservative media mogul Alfred Hugenberg (the Rupert Murdoch of his day), who would also acquire the UFA studio in 1927. This made it a prime target for left-wing groups such as the Volksverband für Filmkunst (Popular Association for Film Art), who saw Rosenthal and Hugenberg as key representatives of a capitalist mass media system dedicated to dumbing down the masses. In 1933, Der Kinematograph, like other film publications, was purged of Jewish colleagues, and the journal itself folded in 1935. —Michael Cowan, 2020
Date Added:
August 27, 2022
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Beilaffe zum „Kinematograpff“ Die Verleihtätigkeit während der ersten Tonfilmperiode 1929-1931 Von Dr. Alexander Jason, Berlin. Filme mit rd. 4 733 000 Meter, also etwa 735 Filme und 1 400000 Meter weniger. Durchschnitt¬ lich sind jährlich während der ersten Tonfilmperiode 245 Filme mit 460 000 Meter weniger auf lern deutschen Markt erschie¬ nen gegenüber der letzten Diese Entwicklung im Ge- amtangebot nach unten wäh- ead der ersten Tonfilmperiode ‘ing vor allem auf Kosten des msländischen Angebots, wie las Zahlenmaterial deutlich er- eist (vgl. Tabelle I). Während Jas Angebot an ausländischen i'imen aller Art während der tzten Stummfilmperiode 2377 >it 2599531 Meter betrug, sind ährend der ersten Tonfilm - eriode 1929/1931 nur 1625 Filme mit 1681 735 Meter, also 752 ' Jme mit rd. 1018 000 Meter ' eniger erschienen; wohin- -gen das Angebot an deut- ' hen Filmen aller Art während der ersten Tonfilmperiode eine W eigerung um etwa 20 Filme erfahren hat. Im Jahresdurchschnitt 1926 bis 1929 wurden 792 aus¬ ländische Filme zensiert gegen *42 in demjenigen der Ton- l'lmperiode 1929/1931. An deutschen Filmen wurden durch¬ schnittlich jährlich während der letzten Stummfilmperiode 2138 »ul den Markt gebracht gegen 2143 in den Jahren des Ton¬ films. Gegen ein Angebot von 77 ausländischen Lehr-, Werbe- und Kulturfilmen im Jahre 1927 steht ein solches von 135 im Jahre 1928, also auch eine über eine normale Entwicklung hin¬ ausgehende Steigerung.