The law of motion pictures (1918)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

48 THE LAW OF MOTION PICTURES nant that they will remain alive to complete the work.66 The contract is one which involves elements of confidence and skill, and each party is entitled to the active and continued collaboration of the other up to the completion of the work.67 When death robs him of that essential, the contract is broken; it is at an end.68 It cannot possibly survive, for obviously it cannot be carried out according to its terms. The surviving author is not bound to continue the work with a substitute appointed by the personal representative of the decedent, for no two people possess the same peculiar and valuable qualities.69 66 Blakely v. Sousa (1900), 197 Pa. St. 305, at p. 318; 47 Atl. 286. “ In all contracts of this character there is written by the law the condition that they are subject to the continuance of the lives of the parties contracting. . . See also: Taylor v. Caldwell (Eng.) (1S63), 3 Best. & S. 826; Spaulding v. Rosa (1877), 71 N. Y. 40; Baxter v. Billings (1897), 83 Fed. (C. C. A.) 790. 67 Spalding v. Rosa (1877); 71 N. Y. 40; Blakely v. Sousa (1900), 197 Pa. St. 305; 47 Atl. 286; Sargent v. McLeod (1913), 209 N. Y. 360; 103 N. E. 164; Baxter v. BiUings (1897), 83 Fed. (C. C. A.) 790; Wolfe v. Howes (1859), 20 X. Y. 197. 68 Blakely v. Sousa (1900) , 197 Pa. St. 305; 47 Atl. 286. “Whatever Sousa may have done after Blakely’s death he did for himself. The term of his employment ended with the death of his employer. . . See cases cited and excerpts in Section 14, page 67, footnote 6. 69 Blakely v. Sousa (1900), 197 Pa. St. 305; 47 Atl. 286. “It would hardly be contended for a moment that if Sousa had died and Blakely had survived, Blakely could have been held to accept in lieu of Sousa’s services the services of his legal representatives or of anyone selected by them.” Dickinson v. Callahan (1852), 19 Pa. St. 227, at 234. “It would seem absurd to say that the administrator of a physician or author, or a musician could be compelled to perform their professional engagements no mat