The law of motion pictures (1918)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

DIRECTOR AND OTHER EMPLOYES 213 such within the scope of his employment is not grounds for discharge.16 He, as well as all the other employes of the producer will be restrained from disclosing the trade secrets of their employer to a rival, in the same manner and under the same conditions as in other commercial pursuits.17 16 Nash v. Krieling (1899), 56 courts on this subject see: DuPont Pac. 260; aff’cl 123 Cal. xviii. Powder Co. v. Masland (1917), For additional cases see: Sec 244 U. S. 100; Todd Protectograph tion 45. Co. v. Hirschberg (1917), 100 17 For the latest expression of the Misc. (N. Y.) 418.