The law of motion pictures (1918)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

260 THE LAW OF MOTION PICTURES “ Proceeds” derived from a benefit or charitable performance have been defined as the balance remaining after deductions for the expenses necessarily incurred for the giving of such a performance.86 Unless specifically exempted by statute, a charitable organization must secure a theatrical license and pay the required tax before giving public exhibitions.87 It is not a public exhibition for a motion picture company to exhibit its reels to dealers by running them off for the purpose of renting or leasing the same.88 Section 83. — Interstate commerce. In New York it has been squarely held that the theatrical business does not constitute '‘interstate commerce” within the meaning of the “Sherman anti-trust law.” The fact that theatrical companies travelled from state to 86 Commonwealth v. Alexander (1904), 185 Mass. 553; 70 N. E. 1017. 87 City of Mobile v. Kiernan (1910), 54 So. (Ala.) 102. Shelley v. Bethell (Eng.) (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 11. Defendant who had a private house fitted up as a private theatre turned it over to another who advertised performances therein for the benefit of a School for Dramatic Art. Held that defendant was guilty irrespective of the fact that the performance was for charity. See also Section 106. 88 A. G. v. Vitagraph Co., Ltd. (Eng.) (1915), 1 Ch. 206; 13 L. G. R. 148; 84 L. J. (Ch.) 142; 31 T. L. R. 70; 112 L. T. 245; 79 J. P. 150. The term “Exhibition” in Section 1 of the Cinematograph Act 1909, refers to the exhibition of cinematograph pictures in places of public entertainment, and does not include a case where dealers in the exercise of their trade of selling or renting films merely show their films by running them through their machines in the presence of one or more customers.