Living pictures; their history, photoproduction and practical working. With a digest of British patents and annotated bibliography (1899)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

FILM-MAKING. 191 FlO. 20I. Fig. 202. case rupture of the film is manifestly far more probable. The importance of these considerations is heightened Avhen the question of strain on the film is considered. Tension on the film is shared between the perforations actually engaged with the sprocket-teeth, and it would appear easy to carry the film round the major portion of the sprocket-roller, Fig. 201, in order to subdivide the strain as far as possible. But this can only be done to a limited extent, for not only do various films differ slightly in gauge, but shrinkage in development and even atmospheric in- fluences tend to vary the distance between the per- forations. In fact, in most sprocket machines the film must lie somewhat more loosely in one case than another, according to the greater degree of separation of the per- forations, while inter- changeable sprocket- rollers, Fig. 202, are sometimes provided to suit the special make of film under exhibition. It would seem that shrink- age had much to do with slight differences in perforation gauges, for at first perforating machines were in some instances made to agree with finished films rather than with the Fig. 203.