Memorandum for the the Motion Picture Patents Company and the General Film Company concerning the investigation of their business by the Department of Justice / submitted by M.B. Philip and Francis T. Homer. (1913)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

uorapany xii iiu&iiiii its vu.rioa8 arrungenonts and obtaining title to t}iO varlouo patonte cannot bo considered ac a violation in any way of i];o Ghoriiian Act, \"o will nor conaider first the aanuf acturero ami iiu)ort©ra liconaoa, and, incidentally, the agreenents between tlie Ha3traan Kodak Company and tiie i^atents Coinpar.y, concorning the furnifhinij of the raw filn ur?od for ns/^t in£ motion nictur es. Tli::: MAVJFACTURKRS* LlCKNUKr. AJ'D THK KA3TIUN KODAK COI/P/WY Tho licenses granted by the i'atents Company to the nine mnnuf aoturers and one importer are nubotamtia lly alike in thoir jiroviaiona. The I'ateiita Company, owning tho basic pntcnt3 covering projecting :.iuc liinea , had tho right under the lieaton reninsulnr Button-yaatener Co. v. Slureka 3pecialty Co. caao, (77 fed. .;op,, i,i3i>) and raany other cases followr'ng thnt, affirmed in tlio case of Konry vs. Dick, decided l.larc h 11, 191i, to restrict the u .e of ;;iiichinB8 containir^ tJic invontlons of ■uch patents tn articles adapted for use in thoro procured from either the t'aten to Cornp'.ny or those auth-rizod ly sucli Company to furnish ouch articles. The Motion Picture Patents Company v/as not a rnanufncturer of those nrticlea, na.-r.cly, notion pictures, and thero -22