Memorandum for the the Motion Picture Patents Company and the General Film Company concerning the investigation of their business by the Department of Justice / submitted by M.B. Philip and Francis T. Homer. (1913)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

and subject to cert::in other conditions enuwernted fully in the Rgroemenl. Gor,ie of th'i^e conditions vere ampli f i c'lti ons of tno3e -fintf^d on each box coutf^ining iao«ion pictures which the -atenta '.bir.pnny'a licrneees ■ n, given the ri ;ht to •■ ^mi h for use only in projecting -nr-chine? oinerfete! under it 3 r*;tentr covering the 3am e, 'md others ^ere tj irevynt, in various ways, -ibuseo which experience hid sho'^n were liable to occur when tiotion rictures were suDlet by exchange , and a] so to fix the terass ©n which such exch'ingea could obtain motion pictures fro"i the Tttents Cornvf^ny * 3 licensfrfip ^nr* the times when they should be returned after use. The exchange agreement was tti'^ainfible by the Patents Con'^any on fourteen lays written notice, but "Ithou.-hit had tiiie right, it never exercired it, ervC<;pt for cause. Thl?i ri !^ht of teiwination 0 i s oh notice was upheld by the Supreme court of the St'jte of New York and the Appellate Uivision in tne case of tne 'Greater ^ow 1^0 rk yilm Company vs. Motion licture iatents Company, recently decided. LKGALI^Y C/ ""IV: :.ty?lC': riCl'U'^ FATKNTj^^ COJ.^PAHY. its !'AKmrACT« MR'hd 'Klio Ikrv^T^Hb AND EXClJANaS LIC!.:i;SKS. So far, there can be no doubt as to the leg'tlity of the '/lotion Picture Patents Company, the licenses it has -33