Memorandum for the the Motion Picture Patents Company and the General Film Company concerning the investigation of their business by the Department of Justice / submitted by M.B. Philip and Francis T. Homer. (1913)

Record Details:

Title:
Memorandum for the the Motion Picture Patents Company and the General Film Company concerning the investigation of their business by the Department of Justice / submitted by M.B. Philip and Francis T. Homer.
Date:
1913
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Department of Justice
Volume:
Memorandum for the the Motion Picture Patents Company and the General Film Company concerning the investigation of their business by the Department of Justice
Leaf #:
00085
Language:
English
Collection:
Early Cinema and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
November 30, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Gtinernie de iiiOnCf.rnphttH , Gin6«,iatograp}K. s ot Appax'tiis de Pi-ecisicn i.rul J. ... uertl , .rwasurer of rathe :'reron, there WU9 an oral «itreecitr.t between counatl to permit the case '-gt..Lii sL . ../incicidr to to cpnaiuored a teat case. Ln tho case against ^cli.iOicitJf, cfter tlio plaintiffs proofs T/oro oxoeu July j, 19CJ, tiiBrt .vaa a .tipulaticn /ebrusLiy o, i.o6, as tu tout ii^iOr.y t )at uight be taken frorr; the r.uit a^^a-iiiiji x/.o nttericaK ;-utc8cope Ooupany case. . vcut t:,ic Liue Jchricidei' cii jcon linaed acLivo Lu8inH»u, aiui , UiorofOi-o, tjiu fui-thcr prosocutior. of this suit .vouid huvc been of r.o ;;'irticulux V!x^..u. liloison ^/aa aovo^inii nla onoi-^iica u/i. reaour-cftfl to lie prosecution of Iho test CMae , uji ti.e Ca:.£.ra riiissue a6ait;f)t the .iioiiraph Coapany, a/id j.ccoaaurliy deaired to ^-wait thH ouicoi.'ie of tnis suit boforo .incurring furthnr l-.i'lio exp'in-ie in pr'jsecutxng tho otl.or auita c:. tho film ^ r. •x-oyNTcnor .tatajj i r; h.a ropoit t.uL in his opinion thiy rbieaje ia of no value, wLi.f^ to tJie dccifeion the G'jjrt of i^.ppeivls in I. hy firat caoe en tue Ldibcn jrigiriai patent to which y-e have referred, and that it ia principully ur.on «h:'f. h« conaiuera this •'worthloso" pater.t