Motion Picture Classic (Jan-Aug 1919)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLASSIC The March of the Photoplay (Cominued from page 17) they seem mere comments and interjections. The story is always arranged so as to flow as much as possible without their help. The whole effect may be melodramatic, because the stories are violent and the method pushed to extremes. But the Sullivan dramaturgy is, after all, not unlike the Ibsen dramaturgy in its definite, tight structure. Perhaps Henry Bernstein, building on Ibsen, is the best parallel. To keep up what may be extreme comparisons, the other distinctive school of the photoplay, which grew up beside Ince in the studio of Griffith, is in the Hauptmann vein of naturalism. The master himself. Frank Woods, and the directors like Allan Dwan, were largely responsible for it. Jolin Emerson and Anita Loos, for all their individual flavor, are products of it. Whatever we see today that bears the initials “D. G.” or has passed thru the hands of one of Griffith’s old directors, has that priceless quality of naturalness and humanness which, as an end, is worth all of Sullivan’s splendid theatricalism. You may wonder, however, if the plausible reality of a picture of the Griffith school couldn’t be got by a little neater work, a little less waste of space, a little less tendency to ramble. So far as Griffith himself goes, [ have to confess that I am very tired ndeed of the one piece of theatrical jnechanism — the rescue by some form of bhase — which he has lugged into every oicture since “The Birth of a Nation’’ to ,jet that sure-fire pep which Sullivan gets )y a careful and workmanlike developnent of whatever plot he has in hand, .n spite of valiant belief in humanness, [ begin to think I prefer Sullivan. At liny rate, Sullivan’s methods can be used or Griffith’s ends. Of course, there are other schools, or lit any rate, classes, in the development ff the photoplay. The propaganda play, rom Eustace Hale Ball’s “Traffic in Souls’’ to the late.st products of Lois vVeber, is not to be sniffed at. Mack fiennett and Hamilton Del Ruth have ontributed a distinct method of their iwn. As for Chaplin — well, who wants 0 see a better screen story, better told, han "Easy Street”? There has even liieen a school which might better be decribed as an academy — a five-foot shelf f the world’s classics — an Encyclopedia Iritannica of stories. I mean the prodcts of Paramount during its first four ears. Since Griffith and Ince joined the Uyrmidons of Zukor and Lasky, things Lre different and better. But what a lltrange collection of famous novels and lays and Broadway failures the Paralounters gave us to match against the riginal and screen-wise products of the Id Triangle ! They began with yarns lat didn’t fit the screen, and they told lem with continuities that seemed to ave no conception at all of screen posbilities. They did one splendid thing, pwever. They demonstrated the ab■xrdity of taking stories as shaped by (Seventy-one) the needs of other mediums instead of going to the root of the stories themselves— human beings. There ought to be a law against the screening of plays and a severe penalty for any continuity writerwho doesn’t throw overboard three-fifths of every novel. If we had seen to it these last five years, where might the prodigious art of the photoplay not be today ? Just where the credit for a screen progress belongs is always more difficult to say than where the blame ought to rest. It is easy to .sec that if a scenario editor starts by buying a stujiid play, his co-laborers are never going to be able to make it into a good photoplay. But when a really decent product is on the screen, it isn’t so easy to determine just who did the trick. Aside from acting and lighting and photography, the genius in the treatment of the story may lodge in at least five places — or, as is more likely, in a single dominating one. There may be a good plot to begin with — maybe an original, maybe the leav ■ ings of a novel. Then there is the synopsis. At that point a writer may vastly enrich a story, give new directions to it and supply all .sorts of valuable suggestions. Next, the continuity. If the continuity is bad, it can ruin evei’}'thing that has gone before. If it is good, it can almost remake a story by its utilization of minor possibilities of action. After that the director can enrich the continuity or ruin it. Finally, along comes the film editor to spoil the work of all four or to salvage an almost hopeless production. The recipe with Ince seems to have been a dominating personality, always intensively but creatively critical, surrounded by men of first-class ability, who react to that dominating personality and stand out by that reaction. Griffith seems to be more a great personality that never bothers to have very much to dominate. He does the whole job himself. Film editing, directing and continuity writing are his regular tasks, as those who have read of his making of “The Birth of a Nation” know. But it is further true that Griffith is frequently the creator of the idea, the builder of the synopsis. There was once a certain “Granville Warwick,” unknown to studio directors but prominent on the credit titles of many Triangle productions. Not infrequently the scenarios he wrote bore interesting resemblance to earlier yarns, yarns from the old Biograph knitting-bag. There was “Diane of the Follies,” for instance — just “Oil and Water” done over. When David Wark Griffith dropped out of Triangle, “Warwick’’ dropped with him. And until Griffith came back from Europe, “Warwick” was silent. Just the other day he turned up as author of Griffith’s “Greatest Thing in the World.” Perhaps he is a relative of the mysterious Monsieur Ga.ston de Tolignac, who has been “suggesting” or “conceiving” other European-born Griffith products. But, however that may be, nobody who {Continued on page 80) DI/1MONDS CREDIT SEND FOR FREE CATALOG There are over 2,000 photographic illgetrationfr,/^ of Diamond Bings, La Vallieres, Ear Screws Scarf Pins, Studs, Brooches, Bar Pins, Watches, Bracelet Watches; also our won . derfully shoy^y assembled Solitaire Dia'mondclustfira. LIBERTY BONOS ACCCPTEO. ■0^ Cind hi Hagdramt Rlag Bai ' Lqftis Perfection Diamond Ring Each Diamond is skilfully mounted in our famous Lof tis Per* fection 14-karat solid gold 6-prong ring, possessing every line of grace and beauty. Down, $5 a Month, buys a iSO Bing. Down,$10a Month, buys a $100 Ring. Down,$12.50aMontb, buys a $126 King. OUR CATALOG illustraiesand describes all the standard world-renowned Watchos; solid gold and gold filled cases; new popular designs. Splendid bargains in 25-year guaranteed watches CA A MnNTH on credit terms as low as ix iTlV/lvin Every article in our catalog is priced unusually low. Whatever you select will be sent prepaid by us. Tod tea ind oi* amioe tlie artielo right In your awn bands. If satisBed , pay one • Bfth of price and keep it; balance in eight equal monthly payments. Send Your Order Today WE HAVE BEEN IN BUSINESS OVEN 60 YEARS The National Credit Jewelers Dept N-616. 108 N. State St, Chicago, ill. STORES IN UADINO CITIES SAVE.® Over 100.000 Underwoods Sold to U. S. Govt That makes rebuilt Underwoods scarce. speak quick for yours. Guaranteed for6 years? You can rent^ buy on easy terms, secure cash discount or earn one through agewr?/ plan; no canvassing. Ask for OfTer No 211. TYPEWRITER EMPORIUM 34-36 Lake St. CHICAGO, ILL. »WAY UNDER MANUFACTURER'S PRICEI Genuine, visible writing Underwoods -rebuilt in our factory, with Back Spacer, Tabulator, Lateral Guide, k Stencil Attachment, 2-color Ribbon. Waterproof Cover and Special Touch Typewriting Guide Book sent on 10 Days* JFree Trial, Stronger, Clearer Voice . for You! Weakness, huskiI1CS3 and harshness banished. Your voice given a wonderful strength, a wider range, an amazing clearness. 'Diis done by the Feuchtinger Method, , rndorsod by leading European musicians, actors and speakers. Uee it in your own h.i'me. Simple, silent exercises taken a few minutes dailyimpart vigor to the vocal organs :ind i»ive a surpassing quality to Uie tones. Send fur the facts and proofs. Do You Stammer? If yon hnve any voice impediment this method will help you. You need not stiimmer or lisp —if you will follow our instructions. WRITE Send the coupon and get our free book find literature. We will tell you just what this method is, how it is used and what it will do for you. No matter how hopeless VourcasemayseemtheFeucht ■* . . inger method will improve > Penecl Voice Institnte your voice 800 per cent. ^ Studio 1S55 1772 No obligation on you if ^ Wilson Ave.t Chicago ^ou asklorthisinforma Send me the book and tion. We gladly send it facte about the Feuchtlngror free, postage prepaid. Meth^. Have put X oppoiito Justmail thecoupon.y^ Perfect Voice 0 Q Stammering Q Lisping Institute . r Name Addreee.,