Motion Picture Herald (Sep-Oct 1934)

Page scan 0006 from Motion Picture Herald

Record Details:

Title:
Motion Picture Herald
Date:
Sep-Oct 1934
Publisher:
[New York, N.Y. : Quigley Pub. Co.]
Volume:
Motion Picture Herald (Sep-Oct 1934)
Leaf #:
0006
Language:
English
Subjects:
motion pictures, Motion pictures -- Periodicals
Collection:
Hollywood Studio System
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
Library of Congress, MBRS, Moving Image Section
Sponsor:
Library of Congress, Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Founded in 1915 by a Chicago printing company as a regional trade paper for Midwest exhibitors. In 1916, editor Martin Quigley bought out the owners, and over the next 15 years, he grew EXHIBITORS HERALD into one of the most important national, weekly trade papers in the film business. Quigley acquired MOTOGRAPHY in 1917 and MOVING PICTURE WORLD in 1927. In 1930, he acquired MOTION PICTURE NEWS and the new 'consolidated' publication became MOTION PICTURE HERALD. From the pulpit of his editorial page, Quigley preached the need to improve the motion picture industry and improve the quality of the films. He skillfully served as a mediator in disputes -- between distributors and exhibitors, between the film industry and the Catholic Church (Quigley was one of the architects of the Production Code). Quigley claimed that EXHIBITORS HERALD represented the 'independent exhibitor' and sections like 'What the Picture Did for Me?' certainly provided a forum for theater owners. But plenty of exhibitors viewed Quigley as a servant to the studios and large theater chains. In response, publications such as SHOWMEN'S TRADE REVIEW, INDEPENDENT EXHIBITORS FILM BULLETIN, HARRISON'S REPORTS, and BOX OFFICE were either formed or grew significantly in the years following Quigley's brief moment of consolidation in 1930. -- Eric Hoyt, 2014
Date Added:
May 30, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

KICK for having failed to predict that Thin Man" was going to be one of the year's^ biggest hits— BUT YOU'LL KISS ME for tipping you off about another "Thin Man" — Yes sir, it's / V* ROBT. MONTGOMERY— MAUREEN O'SULLIVAN r\ p r\ 1 1 "if; I in Wm II I VAN DYKE I J I V 7 11 |h ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^r We told you that this delightful entertainment by the writers and director of "Thin Man1 was going to he a surprise sensation! Look what's happening! WASHINGTON, D. C. Doubles normal bi:! NEW YORK. Beats "Thin Man"! KANSAS CITY. Biggest in months! BALTIMORE. Beats "Tugboat Annie"! BOSTON. Tops recent hits! CANTON. Excellent! COLUMBUS. Beats "Men in White!" Imagine! ATLANTA. Way ahead of "Thin Man"! MEMPHIS. Doi ng swell here! INDIANAPOLIS. Also tops "Men in White" here! EVANSVILLE. Excellent! LOUISVILLE. Beats "Thin Man" by miles! ST. LOUIS. Exceptional! WILMINGTON. Tops "Thin Man" and recent hits! Get going!