Evidence study no. 25 of the motion picture industry (1933)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

6 ^> ^> <^> The Motion Picture Industry permitted to handle films produced by the Motion Picture Patents Company, however, and they in turn as licensed representatives agreed to sell only to such theaters as had licensed projectors. Since at that time all positive films were leased on a flat footage basis, and since any number of positives could be made from one negative and a positive could be shown by any number of theaters, no particular problem of apportionment of film sales among the member companies arose. This move, though fundamental, did not fully meet the situation. Unlicensed picture producers continued to offer their product on the market. Independent exchanges continued to operate. Both these conditions were made possible by tremendous demands for films on the part of exhibitors. Even the licensed exchanges of the Patents Company could not always be kept under control and not infrequently they resorted, under the lure of profit, to violation of the terms of their agreement. It seemed that the only method by which the situation could be kept in hand was to secure a consolidation of the exchanges. So, in 1910, the General Film Company was organized by the members of the Patents Company for the purpose of distributing its films. The General Film Company was successful, under threat of revocation of license, in buying 57 of the 58 exchanges then operating throughout the country. Thus the control of the "film trust" reached its height. Independents, however, led by such men as William Fox, who operated the fifty-eighth exchange and who chose to fight rather than sell, and Carl Laemmle at once opened war on the "trust". In consequence, in 1915, the General Film Company was dissolved by order of the Federal courts. Aside from any legal action, however, there were economic forces which were undermining the combination, forces which were seeking to place the motion picture business definitely on a new basis. Both the public and exhibitors became interested in obtaining a better quality of pictures and not merely in viewing or exhibiting a given