Evidence study no. 25 of the motion picture industry (1933)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

30 ^> ^ ^> The Motion Picture Industry gest single item of expense; wages were 13.5 per cent of cost; and materials, fuel, and purchased electric energy amounted to 20.88 per cent of the total cost of production." Of the total cost value "$128,496,710 consisted of negative films, the remainder comprising unfinished productions, the development of positive films, receipts for laboratory work done for others, receipts for use of studio facilities, and other work done for others. No less than 92.39 per cent of the value of all negative films was in theatrical pictures (both feature pictures and short subjects), in which but 13.06 per cent was in silent pictures." The organization of the production department for a typical company may be seen by reference to Exhibit 4, which indicates the organization for production of the Paramount Publix Corporation as of the first part of 1929.2 Smaller companies obviously have a much less elaborate organization, but usually the same general outline is followed. The production organization of the Paramount Publix Corporation is designed to effect the maximum amount of flexibility. Directors, as a rule, are free to proceed unmolested with their respective assignments. Supervision by associate producers is of an advisory nature ; it is of little importance in productions assigned to outstanding directors. Studio cabinets, consisting of the studio production manager, assistant production manager, directors, supervisors, and studio executive manager, hold weekly meetings to discuss the current problems of the various productions. In this manner each picture benefits from the ideas of all production officials. As a rule, the vice president in charge of production is present each week at either the studio cabinet meeting on Long Island or the one in Hollywood. It is his 2 The material dealing with the Paramount Publix Corporation is taken from Motion Pictures by Howard T. Lewis, Harvard Business Reports, Vol. 8 (McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1930.) The present production organization does not correspond exactly with the description here given.