Motion Picture Magazine (Feb-Jul 1920)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

five feet five and one-halt inches in it and weighs 120 pounds. mine Gagnon, of 145 West lloth Street. New York City. Miss Gagnon appeared so attractive that we asked her .!1 and had some test pictures taken of her. In certain parts of these pictures she has appeared to great advantage. She was horn in Toronto, Canada, and has a hair and dark blue eyes. Her ght is IIS pounds and she measurefive feet three inches Dorothy Williams, of 1225 West 19th Avenue. Spokane. Washington. Little Miss Williams is five years of age; is in the third grade at school and can dance, swim and dive. She has already played in small parts before the camera and exhibits unusual promise for screen work. She has blue-grey eyes and golden curls. Lowe — And Behold! .tinned from page he thinks, should be taken when before the camera, not to over-emphasize. The least expression, of the body at any rate, the better. The stage, on the other hand, supplies flexibility, color, spontaneity. Both have their workaday drawbacks, which must be overcome by the individual player. The screen remindhim of perpetual rehearsals. On the other hand, there is the danger of monotony on the stage, the repetition of the same role, as in a long run. This, however, is offset by the changing stimulus of the audiences. Audiences, he says, are as one man. and the actor "gets" them immediately. He says that he gets a real thrill from the way he is doing things, the combination of the two. He loves the working at the studio all day and then the going on the stage at night and noting the differences in the work, the reactions, the responses. He believes that one must love what enc is doing if one is to achieve any sort of real success. Only by love of work does leve come, back in tokens of appreciation and recognition. He also believes that you must work for succe--, loving the work as you go along. He does not believe that there i much to the overnight burst into fame. "Generally." he says, "you will find that while it may appear to be a combustion there been some sort of training, generally pretty rigorous, back of it all. There may be exception' — but they are very exceptional. Take the Barrymores; take Sarah Bernhardt ; take any one of the great actor or actresses who have not been famous but enduring, and you will find that they have climbed slowly, runtr by rung. It is only so. too, that the real satisfaction of attainment i^ achieved." Mr. Lowe does not speak in any detached sense. He started his career by doing dramatic work at college, in Cal ia. He even took part in the Pa Play given there, and achieved a decided meed of success. After that, he wen* into stock in San Francisco and did about every known part there. He was one of the first member of the Alcazar Tlv This winter he i= in Mr. Belasco's production of "The Son-Daughter," with Lenore Ulric, a-ide from his picture work. •he very best of all possible training. It ling and it ithe prar -ience in one. It is incomparable a-s a training in versatility, It i; limbering, in ever ay. It me that Mr. Lowe 1 ' the reqi ( C ©I°r?S0BP) One Chop Will Buy 12 Dishes of Nutritious Quaker Oats Save 90% And Serve Vastly Better Breakfasts One dollar spent for Quaker Oats buys about as much nutrition as $10 buys in meat and fish and eggs. So a Quaker Oats breakfast, compared with a meat breakfast, saves you some 90 per cent. And in oats you get the supreme food. You get an ideal food — almost a complete food. You get a food which, measured by calories, is twice as nutritious as round steak. And you get the needed minerals. What $1 Buys Xote how much $1 buys in Quaker Oats. It will serve a hundred breakfasts. That same $1 in some other foods will buy you only ten breakfasts. Then compare by calories — the energy measure of food value. That's the way foods should be figured. You buy them for nutrition. Here is what $1 buys in calories at this writing in some necessary food: What $1 Buys At This Writing in Calories In Quaker Oats . . 18,000 calories In Average Meats . 2,200 In Average Fish . 2,000 In Hen's Eggs . . 1,400 " In Broilers . . . 600 " One needs variety in food, regardless of the cost. But the basic breakfast should be Quaker Oats. That is the food which everybody needs. And iis trifling cost will average up your food bills. With That Exquisite Flavor grains only — just the rich, plump, flavory We gel hut ten* pounds from a 1 Tin', flavor has hrought Quaker Oats world-wide supremacy. 15c and 35c per Package Except in Far West and South Packed in Sealed Round Packages with Removable Cover 95 PA ifill