We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
'i Name It!
she expatiates upon hci philosophies, her inne'i self, hei work, hei plav. her opinion,, heliefs, r/ <//
I'll me Hh r,nnl'nl <
bui no, I will not shoulder the brum of the ctedui lion Constance admitted in her sistet N'orm'a dressing-room, in between foraging expeditioi foi pastries and othei edihles. thai the rnatU rested between us as inte
She -aid she shouldn't wonder but what it mighl be some hidden complex. Ii might even, she sur be something, have something to do with psychological phenomena Who could tell While seeming to be merely hilarious laughter, consider able pastry and then more hilarious laughter, there was probably, between us. a substratum of dark. ( Hiverlodgian meaning.
At am rate, she admitted to one halt, precisely one-half, no more and no less, (he responsibility. She is the Kind who will stick' I ever so a v minute this interview s going to 'sink.)
the first place, to wax chron
logical, Constance almost didn't
t all. How could she?
was the fust day of spring, arid
she was shopping . . . You know
ready lor an aeropli • p>n with Sitter Natalie
\Y
.in interview not an
lestion. If am it adequately anilmadge. She
from every known and logical stan
• .m inten iew when I, being
eing her We simply are not, thai
•.nil me that the one and only
• tell the truth, and nothing bui the
II know, believe in
public. Neither, altho this is
ly unim|w>rtant, do I. However that may he,
' "onstance and I. that
«tm'|tl> no iim iii leading the public to believe
am. n it i not. And so we
i tell you this i mil an 'ml, ,
hereupon, the qui
what r'j» it ? I asked ■ d me. and there again,
I '/ We didn'i know. Which
deduction that if wc di<
" into what labyrinths thing < an lead one?
ncompatihility of inter Const;
people