Motion Picture Magazine (Aug 1923-Jan 1924)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

^MOTION PfCTURI IfWl I MAGAZINE Protestations over the liberties which the movies took with several plays and novels. Dear Editor: Not so very long ago a very well-known author denounced the movies in very harsh terms. He said something to the effect that most of the performers were morons and the directors ignorant to the point of semi-illiteracy. Naturally everyone who read this claim opened wide his eyes, perked up his ears and wondered the wherefore of this bitter arraignment of the makers of our pictures. But after seeing the liberties taken with well-known novels and famous plays one cannot help but sympathize with the author. Recently we were permitted to see Miss Clara Kimball Young's version of "Enter Madame,", that sparkling and delightful comedy of Gilda Varesi which captivated New York a season ago. The play has been published, and in a general way the movie of it followed the story as well as might be expected considering the limitations of the screen. Allowances must be made for excessive action in scenes to make up for the loss of dialog which, after all, is the basis of true comedy. But there was no reason under the sun why Miss Young should have elected to make Mme. Lisa Delia Robbia the stepmother of the boy in the play rather than the mother as she was written. Here was a story of a temperamental grand-opera singer in her middle life who returns home after many years abroad to find her son grown and her husband about to divorce her for another woman. It was the mother-love for her boy and her pathetic determination to hold her husband that made this little play so delightfully human. But the beauteous Miss Young could not bring herself to play the mother of a grown young man, so she became his stepmother. The play was a sensation in New York and the talk of the season, but the movie was merely a "movie" — one of the many which are ground out, soon to be shelved and forgotten. It is highly doubtful whether twisting the original story out of shape to fit Miss Young's charms added anything to her screen career. The liberties taken with "Brass" are almost too numerous to mention, but as I am not a fan for that story I will leave the protesting of these liberties taken, to some other person. For inconsistency, stupidity and utter lack of an author's viewpoint, I think "Main Street" as produced by Warner Bros., and "based on the novel by Sinclair Lewis," takes the little concrete biscuit with the little baby blue ribbons tied to it. Could a greater mess have been made of a story than was made with this one. Why in the name of common sense couldn't we have had "Main Street" as it was written ? It must be remembered that more copies of this book were sold than any other piece of fiction in the last ten years. The enormous sale of the book alone would indicate that the story has a very general appeal. But did we get this story translated to the screen? The title was to be sure, but beyond that one could scarcely recognize the mutilated remains of the story itself. Characters scarcely more than mentioned in the book were raised to the nth power of importance in the film. Most of the real characters whose acts and utterances fill the book from cover to cover were left out. Where was Maud Dyer, the wife of the druggist who had an affair with Doc. Kennicott in Carol's absence? Dave Dyer on the screen was apparently a rollicking bachelor. Where was Vida Sherwin the old maid, Carol's confidante and foil? Where was Raymie Wutherspoon with "How I Became Popular Overnight! I They used to avoid me when I asked for a dance. Some said they were tired, others had previous engagements. Even the poorerdancers preferred to sit against the wall rather than dance with me. But I didn't 'wake up' until a partner left me standing alone in the middle of the floor. "That night I went home feeling pretty lonesome and mighty blue. As a social success I. was a first-class failure. At first I wouldn't believe that you could teach by mail because I always had the idea that one must go to a dancing class to learn. But I figured I could risk 10c — especially since you guaranteed to teach me. How Dancing Made Me Popular "Being a good dancer has made me popular and sought after. I am invited everywhere. No more dull evenings — no hitter disappointments ! My whole life is brighter and happier. And I owe it all to Arthur Murray ! "I was astonished to see how quickly one learns all of the latest steps through your diagrams and simple instructions. I mastered your course in a few evenings and, believe me, I surely did give the folks around here a big surprise when I got on the floor with the best dancer and went through the dance letter perfect. Now that I have the Murray foundation to my dancing I can lead and follow perfectly and can master any new dance after I have seen a few of the steps. "My sister's family have all learned to dance from the course I bought from you, and it would do your heart good to see how fine her little kiddies dance together after quickly learning from your new method of teaching dancing at home without music or partner." Learn Any Dance in a FewHours Whether you want to learn the Foxtrot, One Step, Waltz or any of the new dances, you won't have any trouble in doing it through Arthur Murray's new method. More than 90,000 people have learned to dance by mail, and you can learn just as easily. Arthur Murray is America's foremost authority on social dancing. Through his new improved method of teaching dancing by mail he will give you the same high-class instruction in your own home that, he would give you if you took private lessons in his studio and paid his regular fee of $10 per lesson. Posed by Miss Ann Forrest, Famous Movie Star and Arthur Murray, the Vanderbilt's Instructor. Five Dancing Lessons Free So sure is Arthur Murray that you will be delighted with his amazingly simple methods of teaching that he u»r??nTSfnU'd for a H™tted time only to send FIVE ™, LESS0^*S to all who sign and return the coupon. These five free lessons are yours to keep — you need not return them. They are merely to prove that you can learn to dance without music or partner in your own home. Write for the five lessons today— they are free. Just, inclose 10c (stamps or coin) to pay cost of postage, printing, etc., and the lessons will be promptly mailed to you. • ou will receive: (1) The Secret of Leading. (2) How to Follow Successfully. (3) How to Gain Confidence. (4) A fascinating Fox-trot Step. (5) A Lesson in Waltzing. Don t hesitate. You do not place yourself under ai i obligation by sending for the free lessons. Write ti ARTHUR MURRAY Studio 951, 290 Broadway, New York Arthur Murray, Studio 951 290 Broadway, New York City. To prove that I can learn to dance at home in One evening you may send the FIVE FREE LESSONS. I enclose 10c (stamps or coin) to pay for the postage, printing, etc. Name Address City State (Also at 150 Southampton Road, London. England.) Your Figure Has Charm Only as You Are Fully Developed BEAUTY OF FORM can be cultivated just the same as flowers are made to blossom with proper care. Woman, by nature refined and delicate, craves the natural beauty of her sex. How wonderful to be a perfect woman! Bust Pads and Ruffles never look natural or feel right. They are really harmful and retard development. You should add to your physical beauty by enlarging your bustform to its natural size. This is easy to accomplish with the NATIONAL, a new scientific appliance that brings delightful results. FREE BEAUTY BOOK If you wish a beautiful, womanly figure, write for a copy of the treatise by Dr. C. S. Carr, formerly published in the Physical Culture Magazine, entitled: "The Bust— How It May Be Developed." Of this method Dr. Carr states: "Indeed, it will bring about a development of the busts quite astonishing." This valuable information, explaining the causes of non-development, together with photographic proof showing as much as five inches enlargement by this method, will be sent FREE to every woman who writes quickly. Those desiring book sent sealed, enclose 4c postage. \N» THE OLIVE COMPANY Dept. 205 CLARINDA, IOWA 113 PAG f