Motion pictures for instruction (1926)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THREE STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL FILMS 183 ture gives greater opportunity to the teacher to exert a personal influence and to stimulate the class to active thought. Our experiments give clear evidence on the last-mentioned factor, the influence of the teacher. Its importance is indicated by the advantage of oral comment by the teacher during the showing of a film, by the superiority of demonstration in teaching certain acts of skill and by the superiority of the illustrated lecture to an illustrated text. Thus far our discussion has dealt chiefly with the use of motion pictures and other visual aids in that type of instruction which aims largely at the acquisition of information by the pupil. A number of experiments were made in subjects in which the information to be gained is of an especially concrete sort, as in a science, or in which the pupil is required to learn to do something instead of merely acquiring information, as in manual arts and to some extent in laboratory science. 3. In teaching science, demonstration by the teacher is superior to the motion picture. This is proved to be true in both Hollis's and Kolfe's experiments. In both cases the proficiency of the pupils was measured in whole or in part by their ability to perform or to do something, not merely by their ability to express their knowledge in language. Wherein the superiority of the teacher lies is a matter of speculation, but that it exists is clear. It seems likely that it may be accounted for in part at least by the influence of the teacher >s personality in attracting and holding the attention of the pupils and by the fact that the teacher can watch their behavior and vary the presentation by amplifying