Movies in society : (sex, crime, and censorship) (1962)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

152 MOVIES IN SOCIETY jumps from the train, and leaves the passengers with the risk of death. This editing shows at the same time a scene where the train is running on one side and the passenger is shown in his compartment, on the other side. Abel Gance retakes the same images several times, utilizing each time shorter sequences and the movement is more and more rapid and more breathless; thus creating in the mind of the spectator an agony that becomes more and more vibrant and he is forced to participate involuntarily and very often subconsciously, in the impending catastrophe of the train. It can be said that during some seconds, the audience lives within the atmosphere of the accident. This type of editing creates a penetrating and sharp sensation that is also created in the mind of the audience — a feeling of anxiety, agony and suspense. The silent movies officially vanished thirty years ago. At present all the films, even those without sound — the documentaries, for instance, are accompanied at the time of projection by music, or sub-titles. But, in spite of this, there are people who will go and see silent movies in cinema clubs. There are some art critics of the cinema who prefer the silent to the talking cinema since they consider that the former is purer and purged of today's laboratory effects but naturally tastes vary. I, certainly, prefer the talking movie, but this does not keep me from appreciating the wonderful silent films of the past. It is evident that the talking cinema has contributed to the medium of expression and this contribution has contributed to the medium of expression and this contribution has manifested itself in a screen language and in the method of presenting sequences, now in a defective manner, due to sound effects. In a sound film, the language of the images has a predominant role, because the images are accompanied by music; the expression and mimicry of the artist is less effective. The sound also helps to direct the emotion of the spectator. A