We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
Page 2 August 30, 1968 To: Mr. Raymond Shirley From: Kenneth R. Clark about what they are attempting; they seem to be accomplishing some good things in giving voice to people long neglected (be the recipients Negro, Puerto Rican, Mexican American, migrant workers, American Indians, or poor Whites) . In several cases there appears to be a direct link between station programs and positive community action. I do know these stations are com¬ mitted to make a definite effort in this area with or without cost to themselves. Sensitive issues have been raised an aired publicly; official toes have been stepped upon; there has been criticism against the stations. However, I do think it is also fair to report that none of these stations are considered "radical”. None have been in "hot water" very long and all ultimately see their program judgements vindicated. I can also report that all of these stations shut down their transmitters at night with a clear conscience (and that includes stations in Tennessee, Missouri, Florida and Louisiana). I think the point is that our country is locked in a domestic crisis of enormous dimensions. The problem will not go away by itself. On the contrary, I am of the personal belief that the worst is still ahead of us. The NAEB feels that non-commercial broadcasting has an obligation to get into the mainstream of this crisis and make a valid contribution. There is no question of "pressure." We both know this asso¬ ciation is In no position to pressure its member stations, nor would there be any value in trying. However a clear philosophical position is emerging within the NAEB that is In tune with the realities of 1968. I think it will stand any test, withstand any contrary opin¬ ions. Why? Because there is scant choice to do anything else in light of what is happening in America. This, of course, is one reason for my reports to both radio and television stations. The NAEB wants to stimulate a national dialogue on the issue, but I think there is also real advantage in letting stations know they are not alone in this, that sister stations are already fighting these battles and are winning them every day. Now, having said all that, let me come back to the specifics of WUOT. Who is to say that your station is not already doing everything it can do? You are producing your own materials in the human relations category. You do carry HER and other materials on these subjects. But I note that you say you have offended some and "they have remained loyal to us." It seems to me you already are finding your own answers. Whether you should do more or less is entirely up to you. WUOT must perform its unique broadcasting services within the context of the Knoxville listenership, against the framework of your own special circumstances. Only you can best determine how much effort your station can reasonably make and in what manner.