Tape Network, 1950-1953 (1) (1950-1953)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

11-13-53 i NAEB NETWORK REPORT t t MEB Annual Convention Oct® 30, 1953 The following report will attempt to answer such questions as are ©pst often asked about the Network operation, to show something of the conditions ua— der which its Headquarters works* to show both progress and Current problems, and to express recommendations for the improvement of Network service<> 1) NETWORK OPERATION AND EQUIPMENT * The Network Headquarters manner of operation and its equipment are substantially the same as at this time last year* The Net¬ work has squired a little more shelving, a few more tapes (we have almost 7,000 reels), and some minor equipment replacement® It has had two tape inspection de¬ vices built in an attempt to reduce the number of bad tapes being circulated® The Network employs the same number of workers, and for a time during the summer of 1953 it employed fewer® 2) NETWORK OUTPUT ,, Since the installation of the Network 0 s mass duplicator and the commencement of the individual distribution system (as opposed to the old ,! leg system”) last year, the Network output has increased considerably* As many as twenty-two master tapes are duplicated and distributed each week, and as many as 1,250 tape recordings are dispatched® Not all of these recordings are mass duplicateds a greatly varying number of individual dubbings are done each week® The number of series distributed (counting a series as consisting of up to thirteen programs, twenty-six programs as two series) has increased thirty per cent® The numoer of stations to which the Network sends recordings (as distinguished from the number of transmitters or call letters using the recordings* 102 ) has dropped from 85 to 79, but the number using in-sehool programs has increased from 30 to 47 * Ten in-school program series were distributed during the • school year of 1952-53 l 17 series are being distributed during the present school year* Last winder NAEB and Network Headquarters made a count of its outgoing mail® The results 2,000 envelopes and 1,000 packages a month® The envelopes included letters, cue sheets, special announcements. Newsletters * etc®; the packages were mostly tape recordings® This quantity has been increased an estimated thirty per cent, and Headquarters predicts a continued sharp increase® ^ 3) IN—SCHOOL AND GENERAL PROGRAMMING * Because the problem of satisfactorily hand¬ ling the in-school program project is quite different from that of the week-to- week distribution of general programs, the Network at one time regarded the two projects as quite separate and as running more or less parallel in the same office® This proved quite impractical® Neither project can be regarded simply as something done “over and above” or even “along with” the other—especially since the great expansion of the Network operation® There is only on© Network organization in one office, and every job must be coordinated with every other and the whole inte¬ grated into one project* Since last fall, progress has been made toward such an integration but no perfect system has been developed because of the pressures re¬ quiring maximum effort to keep on top of daily output* Unlike the general week- to-week series, in-school programs are mailed in complete series 5 that is, 14 pro¬ grams of a series go to a station at one time* Also stations receive an audition tape for a series before they definitely order it. During the offering and distri¬ bution of these in-school programs, the week-to-week distribution must lessen in quantity to allow time and tape for this work® Or, to put it positively, between