Tape Network, 1950-1953 (1) (1950-1953)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Network Report— 4 1 half-time worker , desk worker (A full-time worker devoting approximate¬ ly half of her time to Network, half to NAEB work) 1 full-time worker devoting approximately half-time to desk work, half to physical processing. In short. Network Headquarters (as distinguished from NAEB National Headquarters) has five full-time workers, the equivalent of one of whom does the desk work in¬ volved. Obviously, this is inadequate bo the present still-expanding operation. The Network Headquarters therefore recommends that additional help be made avail¬ able as needed. In the meantime, one half-time worker will be moved from physical to clerical work, and Network Headquarters will attempt to make use of NAEB Head¬ quarters 1 clerical personnel. the most helpful advance that could be made—and we consider this the main point of this report--would be a careful, realistic redefinition of Station-Network* commitoee relationships and responsibilities and an insistance on orderly standard¬ ized procedure by all parties. This redefinition should be complete down to "who writes what letters." Standard procedure cannot comprehend every conceivable sit¬ uation, of course, but it can and should be made to comprehend the greater part of To help this redefinition, the Network submits the following suggestions, which will be considered activated unless countermanded: NATIONS must submit an adequate number of Program Submission Forms for each pro¬ gram or series they wish the NAEB to consider for possible distribution over the Network. .(Six copies for programs submitted for the Network Acceptance Committee; eight copies for programs submitted for the In-£chool Program committee.) Stations are responsible for the complete editing of programs for general distribution and wiH have edited programs at Network Headquarters at least five weeks before they ar< ^+t. b f r ® d ® ased ° n th ? air * ^ The ^“School Program Committee has in the past said that editing of their programs for Network distribution was unnecessary be¬ cause stations would edit them in adapting them to their own use.) See Appendix B for Program Format Requirements. w g gg . NETWORK , ACCEPTANCE COMMITTEE and THE IN-SCHOOL PROGRAM COMMITTEE will decide , tb lf Cept r e “? d re j ecbion of 811 programs except those which are in any way so ren u er ^ 1 C0Mnittee action impossible or those to which the Network is committed through other authorized agents. In the former cases the decision must be left to the Executive Director of NAEB and /or the Network Manager. be submitted t0 the respective chairmen who will forward the be bhe ^ Ietvork .^ na g e ^ Whether letters of acceptance or rejection should + y w he c °™- ttee ch airraan, the Network manager, or the Executive Direc- * H debatabla * ^is the opinion of the Network manager that these letters tee^orrrenort 1 he committee chairmen, who can write them as impersonal commi- rendfr ^ J t0 be Sent fr ° m Head quarters, the chairmen should expllc ^ committee decisions and any evaluations should be advanced as im¬ personal, quotable committee reports. When submissi°ns involve such large quantities of tapes as to render the submission mp , LJ nu “ be f? °f du Pli<=ated for; 3 and tape recordings for individual committee review S the P subSsSon! Cha “ ° f **" Pr ° Per 00mmittee cal l • “^ting to H TWORK HEADQUARTERS will confine itself to its function as a distribution center