National Archives and Records Service film-vault fire at Suitland, Md. : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, June 19 and 21, 1979 (1979)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

478 9 construction activity likely smoking smouldered for a period, burst into flame, ignited film in a can, and the fire proceeded very rapidly from that point. 16. How much time did the committee spend on the investigation? The committee spent approximately 25 days on the investigation. This would equate to 125 mandays. 17. Did the committee examine the Universal sprinkler contract during the investigation? Yes, the committee did examine the Universal sprinkler contract during the investigation. 18. Did the committee examine the contract to install the air conditioner during the investigation? The committee did examine the contract to install the air-conditioner. This can be identified in the last part of paragraph 3, Part VII of Building Modifications, of the AD Hoc Committee. 19. Why didn't the committee concern itself with the managerial breakdowns in administering the contracts and in maintaining the building? It was felt that there were errors in judgement and omissions but in no way was there any evidence that would indicate a managerial breakdown. The hazards of