The United States of America, petitioner, v. Motion Picture Patents Company and others, defendants (1912)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

In the District Court of tlie United States for tlie Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The United States of America, petitioner, V. Motion Picture Patents Company and others, defendants. No. — . ORIGINAL PETITION. To the honorable judges of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania , sitting in equity: The United States of America, by John C. Swartley, its attorney for the eastern district of Pennsylvania, acting under the direction of the Attorney General, brings this proceeding in equity against Motion Picture Patents Company, General Film Company, Biograph Company, Thomas A. Edison (Inc.), Essanay Film Manufacturing Company, the Kalem Company (Inc.), George Kleine, Lubin Manufacturing Company, Melies Manufacturing Company, Pathe Freres, the Selig Polyscope Company, the Vitagraph Company of America, Armat Moving Picture' Company, Frank L. Dyer, Henry N. Marvin, J. J. Kennedy, William Pelzer, Samuel Long, J. A. Berst, Siegmund Lubin, Gaston Melies, Albert E. Smith, George K. Spoor, and W. N. Selig. The defendants above-named, engaged in interstate and foreign commerce in motion pictures, films, cameras, exhibiting machines and other articles and apparatus used in the motion picture art, are violating the provisions of the act of