Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and brief in support thereof (1916)

Record Details:

Title:
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and brief in support thereof
Date:
1916
Publisher:
New York : Press of Fremont Payne
Volume:
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and brief in support thereof
Leaf #:
0008
Language:
English
Collection:
Books and Government & Law
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
December 14, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

6 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, October Term^ 1916. Motion Picture Patents Company, Petitioner, vs. Universal Film Manufacturing ) Equity. Company, Universal Film Exchange of New York, and Prague Amusement Company, Respondents. Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. To the Honorable, the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United vStates : Your petitioner, MOTION PICTURE PATENTS COMPANY, respectfully represents : I. That it is a corporation duly created and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey. II. That it is the owner of patent No. 707,934, granted to Woodville Latham, August 26, 1902 (upon an application filed June 1, 1896), for Improvements in Projecting Kinetoscopes, or what