Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and brief in support thereof (1916)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

16 latter delivered to the respondent, Prague Amusement Company for use b}' the latter, as aforesaid. VII. That notice of the fact that Precision Machine Company was a licensee of your petitioner and of the terms and conditions under which alone the said machine put out by it under its license could be used, was brought home to the respondent, Prague Amusement Company, by the notice itself on the license plate attached to said machine, and that specific notice that the said machine was being used in an infringing manner was given to all the respondents (pages 745, 746, 748, 753, 735 and 59 ), but thereafter and in disregard of said notice respondents continued their said infringing practices. VIII. That on the ISth day of March, 1915, your petitioner filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Xew York, its bill of complaint against the respondents. Universal Film Manufacturing Company, Universal Film Exchange of New York, and Prague Amusement Company, alleging infringement of its said patent. 17 13 IX. That the said respondents duly filed their an-swer to said bill of complaint, and at the trial urged in defense, inter alia, a license in the Prague Amusement Company to use the said machine furnished it by Precision Machine Company, and the alleged illegality of the conditions of use imposed by the agreement between your petitioner and Precision Machine Company and by the license plate attached to the said machine itself. X. That respondent's contentions Avere sustained by the District Court, Judge Hough presiding, and petitioner's bill was dismissed ; and that the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Cir