A pictorial history of the movies (1943)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

% Griffith Turns a Page Nineteen fifteen was a momentous year for motion pictures, for ;t witnessed the production of a film that was, and still remains, a masterpiece of cinematographic art. David Wark Griffith, like Chaplin, is certainly one of filmdom's true geniuses. His very first picture, The Adventures of Dolly, a one-reeler he directed for Biograph in 1908, revealed a sense of situation and dramatic logic rare in those days. An unerring casting director, he introduced many a future star— including Mary Pickford— during his Biograph days. Griffith is the greatest innovator the screen has ever known. Such devices as the close-up, the fade-out, the iris dissolve, back lighting, the soft focus close-up, the cut-back, and the last-minute rescue are accepted so completely as a matter of course by present-day audiences that it is hard to imagine a time when they did not exist. Yet every one of them results from Griffith's experiments and discoveries from 1908 to 1914. Moreover, he was the first director consciously to treat the motion picture as an art form. His pictures have the indefinable quality of "atmosphere" and are distinguished by masterful lighting and composition. Had he been a painter instead of a motion-picture director, he would have been equally great.