Plan for cinema (1936)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ASPECTS OF THE SOCIAL SCENE 1 9 time. In short, he was aware continually of a replica (and a quite accurate one, too) of that world he knew best, the 'common-sense' world of actuality. Added to this common-sense world of full consciousness was the consimilitude the machine has with the dream-world; this very flicking quality, this instantaneous tacit hiccough eliminates the space-time continuum which is indissolubly with us in our waking existence. For in the super-real world of dream we go in no-time from London to New York ; we can occupy a duality, even a multiplicity of spaces simultaneously. And so we can in cinema. The partly submerged psychological condition of the spectator brought about by fusion of the actual and the super-real in this way, the visual images accompanied by no precise aural counterpart, almost does away with the use of thought entirely. We are called upon to exercise stimulus for recognization, that is all. The mind is not even asked to dwell upon the primitive symbolism of language except occasionally when a title appears. We are reminded of Warwick in Saint Joan when he says : c . . . there is nothing on earth more exquisite than a bonny book, with well-placed columns of rich black writing in beautiful borders, and illuminated pictures cunningly inset. But nowadays, instead of looking at books, people read them.' Warwick prefers to look; it is easier to look than to read. If to-day we call Warwick's preference proletarian we shall not be far amiss.