Plan for cinema (1936)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ON THE NATURE OF CINEMA 55 metallic brilliance, full of dry cynicism, and a sceptical approach to things, is what you expect of a people on the point of realizing Mammon is not all. ^Americans are not afraid to laugh at themselves; the verb cto de-bunk5 is popular in the American vocabulary, as indeed it is fast becoming in the English. Not that the English appreciate true satire; they fancy a propensity for poking about after truth, but in looking for it take very good care not to upset their ingrained sense of decorum should it happen to reflect on themselves. / Films such as Twentieth Century\Blonde Bombshell, and the grimly ironical I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang, are satirical comments on the age. It is as if producer and director had stepped up and said : 'Well, this is what you are, you folk; and, as you can see, you 're a pretty poor lot in our opinion.5 The modern high-tempo dialogue film is probably the finest instrument for satire that has ever existed. For the essence of good satire is topicality. What may have been intensely satirical to the^m de siecle, for instance, will not strike us as so devastating to-day. We are not of that period, and we can only appreciate a period's satirists in relation to their period, not to our own. There is little doubt, I think, Wyndham Lewis's stupendous novel, The Apes of God, will go down to posterity as one of the greatest pieces of satire ever written. But its satiric value will be judged historically; its pure value as art is in its manner.