Start Over

A practical manual of screen playwriting : for theater and television films (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

WRITING THE SCREEN PLAY 191 Tempo and rhythm There has been a great deal of loose talk thrown around about the factors of tempo and rhythm. Both are subjects of an evanescent nature, and have never been postulated, clarified, or standardized. More often than not, the terms are erroneously used interchangeably. Like the word "showmanship," which theatrical entrepreneurs love to bandy about, "tempo" and "rhythm" are resorted to when the speaker intends to be as vague as possible, to avoid having his idea backfire on him. If he says, "There are fifty frames in every foot of film," his ignorance can be thrown into his face simply by referring to any standard book on the subject. But he can take refuge in generalization by saying, "It's the tempo of that scene I don't like," and rest assured that nobody can contradict him. Tempo is one thing, as has been shown. Rhythm is still another. Both are indispensable to the fashioning of a screen play and to the eventual making of the resultant picture. Tempo is timing. Tempo is— as its accepted meaning should indicate—timing. It is governed by the length of time— and hence the number of frames or feet— a shot, a scene, and a sequence should require in order to present an idea or mood as well as possible. Certain mood effects can be achieved by certain timing factors. The illusion of excitement in short-time shots is enhanced, naturally, by short sections of film, by quick camera movements, by character movement, by short spurts of dialogue and the like. Conversely, a sense of calm can be obtained with longer-length shots, with static or slow camera movements, and so on. If the tempi in all the shots are so integrated that the combined tempi can, in turn, be integrated within the sequence, and so that the combined tempi of the sequences can be integrated into a complete picture, the over-all tempo of the picture can be regulated so that what finally emerges is exactly what the screen writer put into the screen play, and what he intended to produce. Rhythm is flow. Rhythm, on the other hand, is a modulated flow of filmic and sound patterns that results from following certain basic principles.