The public is never wrong (1953)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

The Public Is Never Wrong hardt, following the pattern of stage posters rather than gaudy movie bills. Then I hired a press agent and took space in newspapers and theatrical publications. Frohman took it upon himself to bring distinguished persons to the showing, a task the more difficult because of the summer season— the date set was July 12, 1912— when most of them were at their summer homes or at the seashore. Frohman's reputation and enthusiasm were responsible for the many notables present. Nearly every member of the audience had attended many stage performances of Sarah Bernhardt. Consequently there was a letdown feeling at the beginning, for her voice was sorely missed even though one knew it would not be there. It was evident that she was not at home before the camera and her gestures were more exaggerated than they need have been. The play dealt with the Queen's love for the Earl of Essex and scenes had been improvised to make up for the lack of dialogue. The difference between stage and screen was pointed up by the fact that at the end she took a curtain call. The New York Herald's critic no doubt summed up the feeling of stage people when next day he commented on the film. "While it can add nothing to Mme. Bernhardt's fame that she has acted before the motion picture camera, future generations will be grateful to her that she has done so." But I had seen— along with Daniel Frohman and others —a number of things which had not concerned the critic. To begin with, the audience had not been restless