Radio and television mirror (July-Dec 1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Please note these old familiar words: The sentiments herein expressed are not necessarily those of the editors. Mow. what ahont the sentiments of our re;mVrs? NOT so long ago, on a program called House Party, Art Linkletter conducted a week-long search for "the most recent mother." It was a modest stunt, but it demonstrated with frightening clarity just how far people will go to participate in radio's current giveaway craze. First day's tour of the studio audience uncovered a woman whose bab\ was a month old. Next day, it was a mother with a baby three weeks old Every day, Art found the baby a little younger, the mother a little paler Or; Friday, final day of the search, a younu woman arrived at the studio in a wheel chair with a nurse in attendance. She had just left the hospital. Her husband had gone on home with the red, wrinkled infant. To this dauntless lady went the shiny, tomb-sized refrigerator. And across the land, many a housewife looked at her outmoded, too-small ice chest and assured herself, "I'd have done the same thing — for a new refrigerator!" A decade ago the average American dreamed (but never dared hope) that he might someday inherit $10,000 from his long-lost uncle in Australia. Today the dream has grander proportions. And the uncle in Australia has been replaced by any one of 20 national programs that give away a king's ran( som in treasure. • Specifically, radio is now giving away seven million doll; rs per season in cash and merchandise Network prizes alone NOW fOR THl GRAND TRUE J^,.^ ^3,285,472.27 CASH A WHAT'S YOUR J , MIDDLE NAME? J k ^ S' ^ 2b average $84,000 a week. Out-ot-town stations, with their own local giveaways, bring the jackpot up to $165,000. Since this list was compiled, the Mutual Network has leaped into the fray with a program whose jackpot will be $50,000. "It's all a bribe," sputter the critics of radio. "Only way they can get listeners is to give away things!" This, we know, isn't strictly true. A few audience participation shows are first-rate entertainment in themselves. And they'd have a healthy Hooper rating if they gave away nothing but old box-tops. Alas, too many others have no entertainment merit whatsoever. They lure listeners with promises of grand prizes, but let weeks and weeks drag on before the only worthwhile ones, such as a car and a piano, are actually given away. Moreover, one needn't show a gram of intelligence to win all on some of these sessions. Much depends on luck, the prompting of the studio audience and whether or not the quizmaster takes a fancy to you. Sometimes the hints are so broad it's a wonder the FCC doen't come down in wrath and take awav the station's license.