Radio annual (1953)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE XI::\V YORK TIMES, FRIDAY. JANUARY 2. 1953 RADIO & TELEVISION A Laconic Bill Stern, Accepting Conditions of New TV Medium, Calmly Describes Cotton Bowl Game By JACK GOULD Bill Stern, the veteran spartscaster. showed a rare brand of both courage and common sense yesterday. Noied for years as an announcer who practically never stopped talkinK. he comi)letely altered his technique in giving over the N. B. C. network an account of the Cotton Bowl Kame between Texas and Tennessee. The contrast l»etween the Stern of yesterday and the Stern of old was so marked — and so welcomed that there could be no doubt that the sportscaster had deliberately elected to heed the cries of many football fans to let the TV camera t<-ll the storv. Bill deserves crirdit for makini,' an about fare. For a oerson in the public eye that is never easy. The Texas-Tennessee Rame was an acid test for Mr. Stern Ixfcause the Cotton Bowl attraction was an incredibly dull one. But whereas in days Kone by Mr. Stern would have endeavored to camouflage the obvious with a torrent of words, yesterday he succinctly observed that Tennessee was not very K'xxl and let it ro at that. Mr. Stern's major improvement was that he did not chatter while a play was in prosrrcss. for the most part restricting his comment to Kiving the name of the player who carried the bali. On passes and kicks, he kept •itill and allowed the viewer to see for himself what wa^i happening. Even during several occasions when the teams took time out, he said nothing. The viewers waited along with the spectators of the bowl for the sjame to resume, which is enlightened television. Similarly, Mr. Stern al>«tained from analyzing the came in technical gobbledegook. Mr. Stern should complete successfully the transition from radio to TV. His worst troubles apparently are over. THANKS JACK GOULD 1052