Radio annual and television yearbook (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

FILMS' PLACE IN TELEVISION By GEORGE T. SHUPERT, Vice President, Peerless Television Productions, Inc. Shupert NOT so long ago television producers were divided into two camps — those who felt films would play an important role in television and those who felt that all television programs must be live. Today, several years later and with the wisdom born of experience, the dividing line between the two factions is barely perceptible. Both have learned that neither live nor filmed programs offer the complete answer to every program need. Each has its place and each complements the other to make up a well balanced television program. The scope of a live television program is limited, and like the legitimate theatre, it often suffers from shortness of reach in its story telling department. The theatre can over-come this lack of scope by the personal magnetism of the actors who appear on the stage almost within arms reach of the audience. Live television, however, cannot thus compensate for its weaknesses, for with television, no matter how the picture originates, the end result 'as it appears in the viewer's home is a motion picture. Filmed television programs can be shown time again and always in the same flawless manner without fluffs or accidents which can be most embarrassing to a sponsor. They cost less, too, because original costs can be amortized over many markets. Films are the only sure way that local and regional sponsors can compete with high priced network talent. The past year has seen a great increase in the use of filmed television programs. During 1951, microwave relays began carrying live television signals from coast to coast, and sponsors discovered that the time differential offered a real stumbling block. The result has been that several national advertisers are again conducting studies to see if they might not do better with film. I believe that we are just entering a period When many of these advertisers will turn to film to supply the bulk of their program needs. General David Sarnoff's recent prediction that as much as 75 per cent of all television programs will eventually be on film, may well become a reality by the end of 1952. And when one considers that less than 40% of all television programs are today on film, he begins to realize the magnitude of the task confronting the film producers. During 1951 there was a great change in the qualitative as well as the quantitative aspect of films for television. While at the beginning of the year, well over a hundred film producers with varying degrees of talent were engaged in television film production, today less than one-third of this number are so engaged; many of these find the going rather difficult. The incompetents, the shoestring producers, and that fringe element that is ever present when it appears that there is a "fast buck" to be made, are falling by the wayside. And the expanding field for television film product is beginning to attract some really competent motion picture producers. They bring to television the production know-how and financial stability which to date has been largely lacking. Perhaps the most encouraging news to those desiring the best in filmed entertainment is the entrance of such successful Hollywood producers as Edward Small. And feature films are establishing themselves as quality television fare now that better product is being released. Recently we released a group of top features to television stations and advertisers. They are commanding excellent ratings wherever they play. These results again prove that entertaining, well-made films, whether produced directly for television or not, can attract and hold an audience and pay off for the sponsor. When the freeze on television station construction is lifted, films will be ready and waiting to allow the new television operator to get on the air quickly, economically, and with a program quality impossible to duplicate locally. Films will lessen a station's dependence on network programs and they may eventually change the entire structure of television networking. Whatever way we look at it, television seems destined to grow and prosper during 1952, and films will continue to solve many knotty program problems. 1143